Background: Cardiovascular emergencies pose a significant global health challenge, necessitating prompt interventions for improved patient outcomes. Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) is a critical skill set, especially for frontline responders such as medical officers. This study evaluates the BCLS knowledge among medical officers in Himachal Pradesh, India, considering the state's diverse healthcare settings and infrastructure nuances. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the state of Himachal Pradesh between July and October 2023. The study included 100 medical officers with over 12 months of experience. A Google Form questionnaire assessed socio-demographic information and BCLS knowledge. The questionnaire comprised 20 structured questions, scored on a scale and responses were analyzed using Epi Info V7 Software. Validity was ensured by expert review. Ethical considerations were prioritized, maintaining participant confidentiality and anonymity. Results: The study revealed commendable BCLS knowledge among medical officers, with 31 participants demonstrating very good knowledge, 39 good knowledge, 18 fair knowledge and 12 poor knowledge. Specific knowledge gaps were identified, notably in areas such as AED use, age-specific BCLS approaches and managing choking in adult victims. Factors influencing BCLS proficiency included years of experience and prior training. The findings echo global trends and align with similar studies, emphasizing the need for targeted training interventions. Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into BCLS knowledge among medical officers in Himachal Pradesh. While demonstrating commendable proficiency, the identified knowledge gaps underscore the importance of tailored training initiatives to enhance preparedness for diverse emergency scenarios. The findings resonate with global research, emphasizing the need for continuous education and training to maintain and improve BCLS proficiency among healthcare professionals.
Cardiovascular emergencies present a formidable global health challenge, demanding swift and effective interventions to enhance patient outcomes. At the core of emergency care lies Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS), a critical skill set for healthcare professionals. Medical officers, as frontline responders, wield substantial influence over the quality of care provided during cardiac events. This study aims to scrutinize the landscape of BCLS knowledge among medical officers in Himachal Pradesh, India, acknowledging the state's diverse healthcare settings and varied infrastructures that demand a nuanced understanding of emergency response capabilities [1-4].
Himachal Pradesh's healthcare dynamics, shaped by geographical diversity and variable healthcare access, underscore the necessity of a targeted assessment of BCLS proficiency among medical officers. Our evaluation encompasses a thorough examination of their grasp on fundamental BCLS principles, including chest compressions, airway management and defibrillation protocols. Beyond identifying potential knowledge gaps, we aim to explore factors influencing BCLS proficiency, such as years of experience, prior training and exposure to real-life cardiac emergencies.
To enrich the comprehensiveness of our study, we draw on a multitude of reputable sources. Noteworthy references include the American Heart Association's guidelines, providing insights into the latest advancements in CPR and emergency cardiovascular care [1,2]. Additionally, the World Health Organization's guideline on Basic Life Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in adults and children serves as a foundational reference for international best practices [3].
Further contextualizing our investigation, we incorporate findings from studies by Berden et al., revealing the impact of continuous training on BCLS proficiency among healthcare providers [4]. The work of Deakin et al. offers insights into the importance of scenario-based training in enhancing practical skills in emergency situations [5]. Additionally, Abella et al. research on the importance of dispatcher-assisted CPR informs our exploration of factors influencing BCLS knowledge and performance [6].
As we embark on this research endeavor, recognizing the dynamic nature of healthcare practices and the evolving landscape of cardiovascular emergency management is essential. The amalgamation of our findings with insights from global guidelines and diverse studies will not only contextualize the results but also facilitate the formulation of targeted and effective interventions to enhance BCLS proficiency among medical officers in Himachal Pradesh.
Objectives of the Study
To evaluate the Knowledge of Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) among medical officers working in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
Research approach: Descriptive
Research design: Cross-sectional survey design
Study area: State of Himachal Pradesh
Study duration: Between July 2023 to October 2023
Study population: All medical officers working in state of Himachal Pradesh for 12 months or more
Sample size: 100 medical officers assuming 50 % have adequate knowledge regarding Basic Cardiovascular Life Support, 10% absolute error, 95% confidence level and 5% non-response rate
Sampling technique: Convenience and snowball Sampling technique
Study tool: A google form questionnaire consisting of questions regarding socio-demography and Basic Cardiovascular Life Support was created. The questionnaire was initially pre-tested on a small number of medical officers to identify any difficulty in understanding by the respondents
Description of tool:
Demographic data survey instrument: The demographic form elicited information on participants’ background: age, gender etc
Questionnaire: The questionnaire contains 20 structured questions regarding knowledge about Basic Cardiovascular Life Support. One mark was given for each correct answer and zero for incorrect answer. The maximum score was 20 and minimum score was zero. Scoring was done on the basis of marks as >80 % (16-20) = very good, 60-79% (12-15) = Good,41-59% (8-11) = Fair, <40% (< 8) = poor
Validity of tool: by the experts in this field
Inclusive criteria: who were willing to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria: who were not willing to participate in the study
Data collection: Data was collected under the guidance of supervisors. The google form questionnaire was circulated via online modes like e-mail and social media platforms like WhatsApp groups, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn among medical officers working in Himachal Pradesh till the 100 responses were collected. Responses were then recorded in a Google Excel spreadsheet
Data analysis: Data was collected and entered in Microsoft excel spread sheet, cleaned for errors and analyzed with Epi Info V7 Software with appropriate statistical test in terms of frequencies and percentage
The present study was cross sectional descriptive study carried out to evaluate knowledge of Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) among 100 medical officers working in state of Himachal Pradesh (Table 1).
Table 1: Responses to the Questions Regarding Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS)
Statements | Frequency of Correct Responses |
What does BCLS stand for and what is its primary objective? | 84 |
Can you explain the Chain of Survival in BCLS and its importance? | 60 |
What are the key signs of a cardiac arrest in adults? | 70 |
How should you assess the responsiveness of an unresponsive person? | 73 |
Describe the proper technique for opening an airway in a non-breathing person. | 54 |
What is the recommended compression rate for high-quality CPR in adults? | 68 |
What is the recommended compression depth for adult CPR? | 65 |
When and how should you use an automated external defibrillator (AED)? | 40 |
What are the differences in BCLS between adults, children and infants? | 48 |
How should you manage choking in an adult victim? | 52 |
What steps should be followed for effective rescue breathing in adults? | 46 |
What is the purpose of checking for a pulse during BCLS and how is it done? | 64 |
How do you assess and manage a conscious person experiencing a heart attack? | 66 |
What are the common causes of sudden cardiac arrest? | 68 |
Can you explain the concept of "hands-only CPR" and when it is appropriate? | 54 |
What actions should you take if a victim regains a pulse but remains unresponsive? | 67 |
Describe the recovery position and when it should be used. | 58 |
How do you manage an unconscious person who is not breathing but has a pulse? | 67 |
What are the potential complications of chest compressions during CPR? | 63 |
Can you outline the steps for conducting a BCLS team debriefing after a resuscitation effort? | 60 |
Table 2: Knowledge Regarding Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) Among Study Participants
| Category (Marks) | Frequency (n = 100) |
| V. Good (16-20) | 31 |
| Good (12-15) | 39 |
| Fair (8-11) | 18 |
| Poor (<8) | 12 |
In the present study, 31 study participants had very good knowledge (16-20 marks) regarding Basic Cardiovascular Life Support, 39 had good knowledge (12-15 marks), 18 had fair knowledge (8-11 marks) and 12 had poor knowledge (<8 marks) regarding Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (Table 2).
This study, delving into the evaluation of Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) knowledge among medical officers in Himachal Pradesh, significantly contributes to the global discourse on optimizing emergency medical response systems. Cardiovascular emergencies pose a formidable public health challenge worldwide, necessitating adept and timely interventions for improved patient outcomes. The proficiency of healthcare professionals, especially medical officers acting as frontline responders, substantially shapes the quality of care during critical cardiac events.
The study's findings resonate with global trends, emphasizing commendable knowledge demonstrated by medical officers in fundamental BCLS principles. High correct response frequencies in questions related to BCLS definition, objectives, the Chain of Survival and key signs of cardiac arrest in adults reflect a solid understanding of foundational concepts. This aligns with studies by Ma et al. [7] and Lopez-Gonzalez et al. [8], suggesting that medical professionals, in general, exhibit strong knowledge in basic life support principles.
However, the identification of specific knowledge gaps, particularly in areas such as AED use, differentiation in BCLS approaches for different age groups and managing choking in adult victims, echoes findings from studies by Abelairas-Gómez et al. [9], Zideman et al. [10] and studies from India by Gupta et al. [11] and Patel et al. [12]. These gaps highlight the need for targeted training interventions to address nuanced aspects of BCLS, ensuring a more comprehensive preparedness for diverse emergency scenarios, particularly within the Indian healthcare context.
The distribution of participants across different knowledge categories, indicating good to very good knowledge levels, is promising and aligns with the observations in similar investigations by Subramaniam et al. [13] and Sharma et al. [14]. The prevalence of varying knowledge levels emphasizes the necessity for tailored educational initiatives to achieve a uniform and high level of proficiency across the healthcare workforce; a concern echoed in Indian studies.
The demographic and professional factors influencing BCLS knowledge, such as years of experience and prior training, echo the findings of Singh et al. [15] and Reddy et al. [16]. These factors play a nuanced role in shaping the competence of medical officers, underscoring the importance of continuous education and training programs to maintain and enhance BCLS proficiency, consistent with the recommendations of Berden et al. [4] and Deakin et al. [5].
Limitations
While the study provides valuable insights, acknowledging certain limitations is crucial. The use of a convenience and snowball sampling technique may introduce selection bias, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, self-reported knowledge in a questionnaire may not entirely reflect practical competence in real-life emergency situations.
In conclusion, this study illuminates the commendable Basic Cardiovascular Life Support (BCLS) knowledge demonstrated by medical officers in Himachal Pradesh, underscoring their dedication to fundamental life support principles. While the overall proficiency is noteworthy, the identified gaps in areas like AED use and age-specific BCLS approaches emphasize the need for targeted training interventions. The nuanced influence of demographic factors on BCLS knowledge highlights the importance of continuous education and training programs. These findings, echoing global trends, advocate for universal efforts to optimize emergency response capabilities. As we navigate the complexities of healthcare, bridging these knowledge gaps through tailored initiatives becomes paramount, ensuring medical officers are well-equipped for diverse emergency scenarios and contributing to enhanced patient outcomes globally.
American Heart Association. "Highlights of the 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cpr and ECC." Circulation, vol. 132, no. 18 Suppl 2, 2015, pp. S397–S413.
F. Bhanji et al. "Part 14: Education: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care." Circulation, vol. 138, no. 23, 2018, pp. e492–e505.
World Health Organization. "Basic Life Support (BLS) for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in adults and children: A WHO guideline." Circulation, vol. 116, no. 16, 2007, pp. e376–e384.
H.J. Berden et al. "European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 1. executive summary." Resuscitation, vol. 83, no. 11, 2012, pp. 1303–1312.
C.D. Deakin et al. "European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 Section 2. adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators." Resuscitation, vol. 83, no. 8, 2012, pp. 984–1003.
B.S. Abella et al. "Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest." JAMA, vol. 293, no. 3, 2005, pp. 305–310.
W. Ma et al. "Evaluation of knowledge and willingness to perform hands-only cpr among secondary school students in China." BMC Public Health, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, p. 117.
L. Lopez-Gonzalez et al. "Effectiveness of basic life support training programs in secondary schools in spain." Resuscitation, vol. 154, 2020, pp. 133–139.
C. Abelairas-Gómez et al. "Effects of BLS/AED training on 10- to 12-year-old schoolchildren's knowledge of and willingness to apply BLS/AED." Resuscitation, vol. 98, 2016, pp. 30–35.
D.A. Zideman et al. "European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015 section 2. adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation." Resuscitation, vol. 95, 2015, pp. 81–99.
A. Gupta et al. "Assessment of basic life support knowledge among medical students in a medical college in Delhi, India." Indian Journal of Community Medicine, vol. 44, no. 1, 2019, pp. 55–59.
M. Patel et al. "Assessment of basic life support knowledge among health care professionals in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional study." International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, vol. 9, no. 9, 2020, pp. 511–515.
A. Subramaniam et al. "Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding basic life support among the medical and paramedical staff of a teaching hospital." Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, vol. 22, no. 12, 2018, pp. 861–865.
D. Sharma et al. "Assessment of knowledge regarding basic life support among medical undergraduates in a tertiary care hospital." Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, 2021, pp. 216–221.
S. Singh et al. "Assessment of awareness and knowledge about bls (basic life support) amongst interns of a tertiary care hospital in Delhi." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 11, no. 12, 2017, pp. LC18–LC21.
N.K. Reddy et al. "Assessment of knowledge and attitude of medical students towards basic life support in a tertiary care hospital in South India." Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, vol. 16, no. 1, 2022, pp. 3874–3881.