The International Academic Research Consortium is dedicated to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the research published in our journal. When errors, inaccuracies, or ethical concerns are identified in published articles, the journal promptly addresses them. Clear Corrections and Retractions Processes and Policies are followed to keep the process transparent.  address such issues promptly and transparently. 

Corrections & Retractions:

Corrections are issued for minor errors, such as typographical errors, factual inaccuracies, or omissions, that do not significantly impact the overall validity or interpretation of the research findings. Authors or readers who identify errors in published articles are encouraged to notify the editorial office promptly, providing detailed information about the nature of the error and its potential impact.

Upon receiving a notification of an error, the editorial team conducts a thorough assessment of the reported issue to verify its accuracy and significance. If the error is deemed to warrant correction, the editorial team collaborates with the authors to prepare and publish a correction notice, detailing the nature of the error, the correct information, and any implications for the interpretation of the research findings. Retractions are issued for more serious issues, such as scientific misconduct, ethical violations, data fabrication, or other breaches of research integrity, that call into question the validity or reliability of the published article. Retractions are initiated when there is clear evidence of serious error or misconduct that undermines the credibility or validity of the research findings.

Retraction notices are published prominently in the journal, clearly stating the reason for retraction, providing an explanation of the issues identified, and outlining any implications for the scientific record or ethical considerations. This journal allows such authors to respond to the retraction notice and provide any relevant explanations or clarifications.

Process for Initiating Corrections or Retractions:

Corrections or retractions may be initiated by the authors, readers, editorial board members, or other stakeholders who identify issues with published articles. To request corrections or retractions, a submission should be made to the editorial office in writing, accompanied by supporting evidence and a detailed explanation of the concerns raised.

The editorial team reviews each request carefully. It consults with relevant experts, ethics committees, or institutional authorities as needed to verify the validity and significance of the issues identified.

Decisions regarding corrections or retractions are made based on the severity of the issues identified, the potential impact on the scientific record, and adherence to ethical guidelines and best practices.

Transparency and Accountability:

The International Academic Research Consortium maintains transparency and accountability throughout the Corrections and Retractions Process. Correction and retraction notices are published promptly and prominently in the journal, ensuring that readers are informed of any errors or misconduct identified in published articles.

The journal maintains a clear record of all corrections and retractions issued, including the reasons for each action taken, to uphold transparency and accountability in the publication process. Authors who disagree with decisions regarding corrections or retractions have the right to appeal the decision. 

Appeals should be submitted to the editorial office in writing, accompanied by a detailed explanation of the grounds for appeal and any supporting evidence or documentation. These appeals are reviewed by the editorial board or an independent appeals committee. After a thorough evaluation, decisions are made based on the merits of the case and adherence to journal policies and ethical guidelines.

The International Academic Research Consortium is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and credibility in scholarly publishing. Our Corrections and Retractions Process and Policies address errors, inaccuracies, or ethical concerns identified in published articles are addressed promptly, transparently, and responsibly. Through clear procedures, accountability, and adherence to ethical guidelines, we maintain the trust and confidence of our readers, authors, and the broader research community.

Complaints and Appeals-

The International Academic Research Consortium is committed to providing a fair and transparent process for addressing complaints and appeals related to published articles, editorial decisions, or any other aspects of the journal's operations. Our Complaints and Appeals Policy aims to ensure that concerns raised by authors, reviewers, readers, or other stakeholders are addressed promptly, impartially, and effectively. 

We outline our policy and the process for handling complaints and appeals:

• Complaints and appeals may relate to various aspects of the journal. It includes editorial decisions, publication processes, authorship disputes, ethical concerns, or conflicts of interest.
• The most common appeals and complaints revolve around dissatisfaction with editorial decisions, concerns about the accuracy or integrity of published articles, or disputes regarding authorship or attribution.
• Complaints or appeals should be submitted to the editorial office in writing, either by email or through the journal's online submission system.
• Submissions should include detailed information about the nature of the complaint or appeal. Relevant information, supporting evidence, or documentation, along with the desired outcome or resolution sought should be included. 
• Upon receiving a complaint or appeal, the editorial team conducts an initial review to assess the validity and significance of the issues raised.
• The complainant or appellant receives an acknowledgment of receipt, confirming that their concerns have been received and will be further investigated.
• The editorial team investigates each complaint or appeal thoroughly, consulting relevant stakeholders, experts, or institutional authorities as needed to gather additional information or perspectives.
• The investigation process may involve reviewing editorial records, correspondence, manuscript files, or other relevant documentation to understand the context and circumstances of the complaint or appeal.
• Efforts are made to resolve complaints or appeals promptly and fairly. Its goal is to achieve a satisfactory outcome for all parties involved.
• Throughout the investigation process, the editorial team maintains open communication with the complainant or appellant, providing regular updates on the status of their complaint or appeal.
• Timely responses are provided to address any questions, concerns, or additional information provided by the complainant or appellant during the investigation.
• If the complainant or appellant is dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial investigation, they may request an appeal of the decision.
• Appeals should be submitted in writing to the editorial office, clearly stating the grounds for appeal and any new evidence or information to be considered.
• Appeals are reviewed by the editorial board or an independent appeals committee, which conducts a thorough reassessment of the issues raised and may overturn or modify the initial decision based on the merits of the case.
• The final decision on complaints or appeals is communicated to the complainant or appellant in writing, along with a rationale for the decision reached.
• Efforts are made to address any remedial actions or resolutions agreed upon as part of the decision. It is made sure that the actions align to achieve a satisfactory outcome and maintain the trust and confidence of all stakeholders.