Brain tumors represent a complex and serious public health concern due to their significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Public awareness and knowledge play a crucial role in early detection, timely treatment, and improved outcomes. This study aimed to assess the level of awareness and knowledge regarding brain tumors among the general public of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to July 2023 among 400 adults aged 18 years and above who had been residing in the district for at least one year. Data were collected using a validated structured Google Form questionnaire consisting of demographic variables and 20 knowledge-based questions on brain tumors. Data analysis was performed using Epi Info V7, applying descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages. The findings revealed that while a majority of participants had heard of brain tumors, detailed knowledge regarding risk factors, types, diagnostic methods, treatment options, and support resources was limited. Overall, 25.75% of participants demonstrated very good knowledge, 35.5% had good knowledge, 25.25% had fair knowledge, and 13.5% exhibited poor knowledge regarding brain tumors. The study highlights notable gaps in public understanding, particularly in areas related to prevention, diagnosis, and comprehensive management. These findings emphasize the need for targeted health education and awareness programs to improve public knowledge and promote early detection and informed decision-making related to brain tumors in District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Brain tumors, a significant medical concern, exert a profound impact on individuals' health and well-being, warranting attention as a complex public health challenge. The intricate nature of the human brain and the potential consequences of tumor development within this vital organ underscore the urgency of understanding public awareness and knowledge about brain tumors. This study aims to assess the level of awareness and knowledge regarding brain tumors among the general public of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Brain tumors encompass a diverse group of neoplasms arising from abnormal cell growth within the brain or its supporting structures. The brain's complexity and essential functions make tumor management particularly intricate, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach for effective diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. The global burden of brain tumors has prompted a growing emphasis on early detection, accurate diagnosis, and advancements in treatment modalities [1].
Despite the medical significance of brain tumors, public awareness about these conditions remains relatively limited. A lack of awareness can lead to delays in seeking medical attention, hinder the adoption of preventive measures, and contribute to the stigma surrounding brain tumor diagnoses. Empowering the public with accurate information is essential to facilitate timely interventions, improve patient outcomes, and reduce the emotional and economic burdens associated with brain tumors [2-3].
District Shimla, nestled in the picturesque landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, has witnessed notable improvements in healthcare accessibility and infrastructure. However, the awareness and knowledge levels regarding brain tumors within this region have not been extensively explored. Given the diverse demographics and risk factors prevalent in this district, understanding the existing awareness gaps and knowledge deficits is crucial. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by evaluating the awareness and knowledge of brain tumors among the residents of District Shimla.
Objectives of the Study
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the level of awareness and knowledge regarding Brain Tumor among the general public of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Research Approach: The present study adopts a descriptive research approach, aiming to comprehensively assess the knowledge levels of the general public in District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, regarding Brain Tumor
Research Design: A cross-sectional survey design was employed to collect data at a specific point in time, providing insights into the knowledge levels of participants
Study Area: The research was conducted exclusively within District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, ensuring the relevance and contextuality of the study findings
Study Duration: The study was conducted over a period extending from April 2023 to July 2023, allowing for an adequate collection of data
Study Population: The study targeted all adults aged 18 years and above, who had been residing within District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, for a minimum duration of 12 months
Sample Size: To ensure robust results, a sample size of 400 adults was determined based on the assumption that 50% of participants possessed adequate knowledge about Brain Tumor. The sample size estimation considered a 5% absolute error, a 95% confidence level, and a 5% non-response rate
Study Tool: A meticulously designed structured Google Form questionnaire served as the primary data collection instrument. The questionnaire underwent pre-testing among a small group of individuals to ensure its clarity, comprehensibility, and suitability for the study's objectives
Description of Tool
The questionnaire comprised two sections:
Demographic Data Survey Instrument: This section collected key background information such as participants' age, gender, marital status, religion, employment status, and educational background
Questionnaire: This section encompassed 20 structured questions tailored to assess participants' knowledge of Brain Tumor. Correct answers were assigned one mark, while incorrect responses received zero marks. The scoring ranged from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 20. Knowledge levels were subsequently categorized into four tiers: >80% (16-20) - very good, 60-79% (12-15) - good, 41-59% (8-11) - fair, and <40% (<8) - poor
Validity of Tool: The questionnaire's accuracy and appropriateness were meticulously validated by domain experts, ensuring its reliability as a robust instrument for data collection
Data Collection: Supervised data collection was executed with vigilance. The Google Form questionnaire was strategically disseminated through diverse online platforms, including emails, social media groups such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Both rural and urban areas of District Shimla were included in the data collection process, ensuring comprehensive coverage. The process was concluded upon obtaining 400 valid responses
Data Analysis: Collected data were meticulously entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subjected to thorough error checks. Epi Info V7 software was employed for data analysis, wherein appropriate statistical methods such as frequencies and percentages were applied
Ethical Considerations: Stringent adherence to ethical guidelines ensured the protection of participants' privacy and confidentiality throughout the research journey, affirming their trust and safeguarding their personal information
The goal of the current study was to assess general public knowledge regarding Brain Tumor through a non- experimental descriptive survey. A total of 400 respondents took part in the study, with 152 (38%) coming from urban areas and 248 (62%) from rural areas
(Table 1).
In the present study 25.75% (103) participants had very good knowledge (16-20 marks) towards Brain Tumor, 35.5% (142) had good knowledge (12-15 marks), 25.25% (101) had fair knowledge (8-11 marks) and 13.5% (54) having poor knowledge (<8 marks) (Figure 1).
Table 1: Knowledge Regarding Brain Tumor among Study Participants
| No. | Statements | Frequency of Correct Responses | % |
| 1 | Have you heard of the term "brain tumor" before? | 294 | 73.5 |
| 2 | Can you briefly explain what a brain tumor is? | 231 | 57.75 |
| 3 | What are some common symptoms that individuals with brain tumors might experience? | 242 | 60.5 |
| 4 | Are brain tumors more common in adults or children? | 217 | 54.25 |
| 5 | What are the potential risk factors associated with the development of brain tumors? | 156 | 39 |
| 6 | Can you name different types of brain tumors? | 65 | 16.25 |
| 7 | How are brain tumors typically diagnosed by medical professionals? | 134 | 33.5 |
| 8 | What are some common treatment options available for brain tumors? | 123 | 30.75 |
| 9 | Are all brain tumors cancerous (malignant), or can they be non-cancerous (benign) as well? | 178 | 44.5 |
| 10 | What is the significance of early detection in brain tumor management? | 242 | 60.5 |
| 11 | Can brain tumors cause neurological deficits or changes in cognitive function? | 214 | 53.5 |
| 12 | Are there any preventive measures that individuals can take to reduce their risk of developing brain tumors? | 127 | 31.75 |
| 13 | How does a brain tumor form and grow within the brain? | 132 | 33 |
| 14 | Can you explain the difference between primary and secondary brain tumors? | 129 | 32.25 |
| 15 | What imaging techniques are commonly used to visualize brain tumors? | 188 | 47 |
| 16 | Is surgery the only treatment option for brain tumors, or are there alternatives? | 216 | 54 |
| 17 | What role does chemotherapy play in brain tumor treatment? | 102 | 25.5 |
| 18 | Are there any support groups or resources available for individuals diagnosed with brain tumors? | 87 | 21.75 |
| 19 | Can lifestyle factors, such as diet and exercise, impact the risk of brain tumor development? | 219 | 54.75 |
| 20 | How important is ongoing medical follow-up for individuals who have been treated for brain tumors? | 231 | 57.75 |

Figure 1: Knowledge Scores towards Brain Tumor among Study Participants
The findings of this comprehensive study shed light on the current level of awareness and knowledge regarding brain tumors among the general public of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. The results underscore the importance of targeted educational initiatives to address knowledge gaps and empower individuals with accurate information about brain tumors, their risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options.
The awareness and understanding of brain tumors are critical due to their complex nature and potential impact on individuals' health. While a significant portion of participants had heard of the term "brain tumor," the study reveals variations in their ability to explain what a brain tumor is. This highlights the need for disseminating clear and accessible information to improve the public's understanding of these conditions.
Identifying common symptoms associated with brain tumors is crucial for early detection and timely medical intervention. The participants' recognition of symptoms suggests a moderate level of awareness, which can contribute to improved patient outcomes through prompt medical attention. However, the study also indicates a need for further education to enhance the public's ability to identify less obvious symptoms.
The study results highlight that brain tumors are more commonly associated with adults than children. This distinction is crucial for healthcare providers to address suspicions and undertake appropriate diagnostic measures in adults with potential symptoms.
The knowledge deficits in identifying potential risk factors for brain tumor development are notable. This finding emphasizes the importance of targeted educational campaigns to inform the public about risk factors such as genetic predisposition, radiation exposure, and certain medical conditions.
While participants demonstrated awareness of the significance of early detection, certain aspects of brain tumor diagnosis and treatment options require further clarification. The understanding of diagnostic methods, treatment alternatives beyond surgery, and the role of chemotherapy remains areas for improvement.
The participants' recognition of the distinction between malignant and benign brain tumors indicates a basic understanding of tumor classification. This fundamental awareness can be further developed to include nuances about tumor behavior, prognosis, and treatment implications.
The study findings regarding preventive measures and lifestyle factors are significant. The public's recognition of the potential impact of lifestyle choices on brain tumor risk is a positive aspect that can serve as a foundation for health promotion efforts.
The study's results also indicate that knowledge regarding imaging techniques, tumor growth mechanisms, and support resources for individuals with brain tumors requires enhancement. This underscores the importance of providing comprehensive information to the public, facilitating informed decisions and actions.
The distribution of knowledge levels between urban and rural areas showcases consistent patterns, suggesting that educational interventions should be tailored to both settings. This approach is vital for ensuring equitable access to accurate information regardless of geographic location.
The outcomes of this study align with global trends indicating that increasing public awareness and knowledge about brain tumors remains a challenge.4 The distribution of knowledge levels among study participants mirrors findings from similar studies conducted in diverse regions, emphasizing the need for ongoing efforts to bridge information gaps and empower the public with accurate and comprehensive knowledge about brain tumors [5-6].
This study's findings underscore the importance of enhancing public awareness and knowledge about brain tumors in District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. While there is a foundation of awareness, the study highlights areas of limited knowledge that require targeted educational initiatives. Empowering the public with accurate information about brain tumors, including their symptoms, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options, is essential for promoting early detection, informed decision-making, and improved patient outcomes. The results emphasize the need for tailored awareness campaigns, accessible information dissemination, and health education to empower individuals in matters related to brain tumor awareness and care.
Ostrom, Q.T. et al. “CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010–2014.” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 19, suppl. 5, 2017, pp. v1–v88.
Weller, M et al. “European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas.” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 18, no. 6, 2017, pp. e315–e329.
Bondy, M.L. et al. “Brain tumor epidemiology: Consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium.” Cancer, vol. 113, no. 7, suppl., 2008, pp. 1953–1968.
Zaki, M. et al. “Awareness about brain tumors in a Pakistani population.” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 7, 2012, pp. 3363–3366.
Ibrahim, A. et al. “Brain tumor awareness and knowledge in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study.” PLOS One, vol. 13, no. 2, 2018, e0193637.
Khan, R.S. et al.. “Knowledge and perception of brain tumour among general public in Pakistan: A multi-centre study.” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 18, no. 5, 2017, pp. 1265–1269.