Over the past four decades, Zimbabwe has carried out the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) of redundant veterans as a part of the transition from warfare to peace. The achievement of the GDR is visible as a sine qua non for lengthy-term peace and balance. The instantaneous reason of the approach is to restore protection and stability through the responsible managing of veterans' weapons. The sluggish aim is to enable former veterans to grow to be efficient participants of their nearby businesses. Therefore, the GDR has the capability to facilitate safety and development by means of ensuring the human safety of warfare veterans through their prolonged-time period sustainable reintegration into post conflict settings. 

The United Nations (UN) has been intentionally excluded from playing a key function in Zimbabwe's independence process. Britain, the previous colonial energy, wished to control and affect most effective in a brief period of transition that did now not embody a hard postwar peacebuilding characteristic [1]. Following the Lancaster House Agreement on Rhodesia of 21 December 1979, a small British-led Commonwealth group oversaw the oversight of the Zimbabwe ceasefire and transitional elections that led to proper majority authorities and independence.

Background To the Study

He publish-independence regime faced the combination of a brand-new navy in the center of the GDR. This report discusses DDR approaches and outcomes in Zimbabwe. It does this in sections. The first offers with the case of Zimbabwe. The conclusion section then gives some sensible coverage hints and food for concept to enhance destiny DDR efforts. The GDR of Zimbabwe became formulated and implemented after the abandonment of a protracted, prolonged and bitter liberation conflict or a second Chimurenga. The warfare of liberation of the Nineteen Sixties and 1970s pitted the wings of the African National Union of Zimbabwe (ZANU) and the African People's Union of Zimbabwe (ZAPU) ZANLA and ZIPRA military, respectively, closer to the Security Forces. Of Rhodesia (RSF) [2].

In October 1976, ZANU and ZAPU merged into the quick-lived Free Patriotic Front (PF) tactical alliance in an attempt to acquire a unified army method to RSF via the Zimbabwean People's Army (ZIPA). However, simply as there has been mutual hostility between the forces among PF and RSF, there has been hostility in the pressure inside the liberation army’s alliance [3]. Zimbabwe is experiencing a protracted and brutal struggle of armed liberation, in which complete-fledged guerilla armies (ZANLA and ZIPRA) have actively engaged the RSF towards a record of mutual hostility and suspicion referred to as a complicated struggle of submission. Launch to the GDR. 

In Zimbabwe, demobilization and reintegration suffered from programmatic and institutional gaps and by means of 1990 up to 25,000 warfare veterans have been unemployed [7]. The founding of the Zimbabwe National Liberation Battle Veterans Association (ZNLWVA) has supplied war veterans with an institutionalized way and platform to lobby for authorities’ popularity, social aid, and their relevance within a conflict society. Consequently, the identification of combat veterans as "combat veterans" has been ingrained. This changed into followed through the use of the gradual evolution of some militants as ZNLWVA sought the recognition and glorification of the freeing roles of its individuals. Former opponents might mobilize their identity as "veterans of the warfare" to win in instances thru a violent shape and strategic alliance with the ruling birthday party ZANU PF, their monetary and political goals.

Krieger argues that the connection among the ZANU PF authorities and warfare veterans has been usually characterized through the direction of "electricity in pursuit of programs, its calls for progressive release, its use of violence and intimidation" and its " simultaneous battle and collaboration as a celebration and veterans control each other [2]. For example, after a complicated reintegration, the government's suspension of a fund for war victims, which had emerged as the maximum essential break out course for the homeless for warfare veterans, it created an explosive situation and the authorities quickly found themselves in conflict with the disaffected ex-veterans who completed continuous protests against the belief of bureaucratic mess and mistreatment [4].

Protests in Harare, which frequently proved unpleasant, protected stopping on the gates of the presidential residence (residen Zimbabwe State and Home), demonstrations outside the presidential offices (Munhumutapa building) at some point of a spherical of cupboard meetings, demonstrations in the course of the African American Summit, and disrupting Heroes' Day commemorations at National Heroes Acre. Veterans of the battle (and birthday party young adults) also featured prominently way to the pioneering political advertising marketing campaign of ZANU PF's birthday celebration and electoral markets inside the violent agrarian reform application and elections. Parliamentary and presidential elections of 2000 (The carry in August 18, 2000). Sections of the same corporations have reportedly been appropriately mobilized thru using ZANU PF as a part of the present day uncertain electoral debacle, in which numerous suspected competition supporters were intimidated or even killed. Rupiya [5], states that the success of Namibia's disarmament and demobilization has been undermined by means of the independence authorities's lack of ability to design and implement global reintegration applications. The high expectations for secure, impartial livelihood have vanished amongst many disenchanted former individuals of the Namibian Human Liberation Army (PLAN) who have no longer completely reintegrated into Namibian society. The euphoria of getting back from exile, elections and the jubilation of independence have been replaced through numerous socio-economic vices and problems, consisting of melancholy, alcoholism, suicide and, in superb cases, the usage of violent conduct. The risk to national security and balance posed by the unemployed and frustrated former PLAN opponents has materialized in public unrest and riots over welfare steering (consisting of cash bills), employment and authority reputation. 

In 1995, a big quantity of former PLAN opponents marched to the places of work of the President and the Prime Minister. More important protests came about in July 1997, coinciding with comparable protests by means of veterans in Zimbabwe. Protests continued during Namibia in 1998. For example, in July 1998, former PLAN combatants unemployed from Okahao and Outapi embarked on an "activity march" at Ondangwa airport asking the government to assist them find a task. Comfy. After tenting at the airport for over three weeks, the actual protesters had amassed thru warring corporations from the Oshikoto and Ohangwena areas who had been employed to provide jobs for former veterans and who have been now having troubles with their corporations. War veterans complained that the authorities forgot them. 

As of June 5, 2007, one hundred former PLAN freedom warring parties marched to the Veterans Affairs Department in downtown Windhoek with similar needs [6]. In South Africa, one-time bonus payments, a counseling and consulting provider, and a Service Corps education plan have no longer furnished sustainable reintegration for suffering veterans. Unsuccessfully reinstated battle veterans participated in small-scale protests to focus on their grievances. As early as August 1993, 27 former unemployed and disappointed human beings from the army wing of the African National Congress, Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), prepared a 10-day sit-in on the ANC workplaces in Durban to ask for social help. Paralyzing their operations. 

In November 2000, nearly one hundred unemployed former MK and Azania Peoples Liberation Army (APLA) opponents have been tested within the Western Cape, and on August 17, 2002 a few war veterans joined the motion's dialogue discussion board. To protest the Sector Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg [7]. Although the protests in South Africa can also be miniscule in nature, South African veterans of the conflict and veterans have had a poor effect on wider stability near [8]. Africa have become the most vital local mercenary distributor for conflict zones in conjunction with Angola. Democracy in 1994 turned into followed via the exodus of many SADF infantry reluctant to join the brand new forces. This, in conjunction with the disbandment of to be had Counterinsurgency Resources, along with the thirty second Battalion, the Koevoet (Lever) unit, and the following each black and white employee since the new military pressure has led to a punctual supply of mercenaries. 

Mozambique's reintegration approach, the principle issue of which has been transformed into a 12-month economic compensation application, referred to as the reintegration assistance software, has managed to "repay and disperse" the demobilized teams. Subsequently, two associations of conflict veterans have been organized to symbolize the pursuits of their participants and, as the fighters had expressed their dissatisfaction with a number of the activities. In 1996, former warring parties engaged in sporadic riots in opposition to unemployment and the want for war pensions. The truth that till April 1999 the general public of 5,000 of the 22,000 ex-combatants registered in Renamo had been entitled to obtain pensions is enlightening and enlightening. Drastically, but, several Mozambican struggle veterans have confirmed their willingness and potential to behave as advocates for violence and as surrogate traders [9].

In 1997, former kids of the ruling birthday party Frelimo and the rebellion Renamo teamed as much as found an association called Propaz (For Peace). The association operates in six US provinces, where its volunteers assist neighboring groups to resolve conflicts with out the usage of violence [10]. According to Mazarire and Rupiya, [2], the absence of smooth documents, recommendation and reference systems negatively impacts the previous veteran's statistics and orientation.

Additionally, the community and families which can absorb former veterans won't be safely prepared to achieve this. The coverage of the Zimbabwean authorities on the reinstatement of the dissemination of records applicable to warfare veterans has ceased to be widely and constantly carried out. The lengthy months of state of no activity that warfare veterans spent in the reunification elements looking forward to integration and demobilization had not been used productively to assemble a battle veteran’s database or to elicit pre-go away orientation. War veterans complained about the authorities' lack of software clarity, an incapacity to prepare their socio-economic profiles and profession aspirations, and a lack of work suggestions and tracking mechanisms. These shortcomings contributed to unsustainable reintegration and next participation in demonstrations thru the usage of affected veterans.

Research Objectives 

• To analyse the integration implementation process in Zimbabwe

• To assess the demobilisation policy of Zimbabwe

Lancaster House Agreement and DDR: Ending the War at the Cost of Long-Term Stability?

The agreement of the Lancaster residence, a "largely preconceived British agreement plan" that is now not particular in integration and in the GDR, ended the conflict [2]. Integration and the GDR had been neither sticks nor carrots in peace negotiations and agreements, irrespective of attempts to mention those problems. British/Commonwealth mediators, worried approximately ending the conflict in a well-timed manner, without problems bypassed those problems, arguing that this would be the responsibility of the elected authorities. This performed at the arms of RSF commanders who had preached their involvement in the Lancaster talks to hold the Navy's recognition quo before the election [11]. PF was pressured to sign the Lancaster Residency Agreement, a "largely preconceived British settlement plan" [3]. 

Mozambique and Zambia had issued ultimatums threatening to withdraw the bases of the PF, given the savage punitive raids by means of RSF within the guerrilla sanctuaries and the massive infrastructure in those neighboring nations. Also weighed at the peace conference changed into the possibility that England could legitimize the present-day Rhodesian coalition authorities led with the aid of Muzorewa the “2d-elegance solution” at the occasion of a withdrawal of the PF from the negotiations. Furthermore, the FP anticipated an electoral victory that would permit them to preside over the integration between book and independence and DDR tactics. The elite presence at the Lancaster House settlement, which refrained from the reputation of independence and praise of the forces of the GDR and the PF, did now not want a number of the common veterans. And PF, and in effect from 24.00 on 21 December 1979, ordered a demilitarization procedure through the separation and containment of veterans of the liberation in special Reunion Points (AP), and of the RSF in their installed bases. 

The Ceasefire Commission (CFC) and a modest Commonwealth Monitoring Force (CMF) furnished the institutional framework for enforcing the Agreement. Operational shortcomings and organizational failures have not prevented a hit transition of Zimbabwe. Since the Lancaster House Agreement did not provide the felony framework for the trial, the submit-independence authorities of Zimbabwe applied a practical DDR alongside the military integration of the three former parties to the conflict, particularly RSF, ZANLA (Army of African National Liberation of Zimbabwe) and ZIPRA (Zimbabwe). People's Revolutionary Army), right into a country wide military.

Pre-Integration Disarmament and Demobilisation

Prior to the integration of the three forces, some units of the RSF had been disbanded, along with the Selous Scouts, the Guard Force, and Muzorewa's auxiliary forces. These gadgets have been no longer eligible for full integration, as they had been established for particular counter-liberation functions and were not intended to be everlasting forces [12]. Furthermore, these units had been related to atrocities during the conflict and had become fully political at some point of the negotiations; paying homage to the Koevoet in Namibia. Many RSF members also withdrew from the forces earlier than the mixing manner. The RSF recruits actually withdrew and lower back to their pre-enlistment employment. Regular individuals of RSF additionally benefited from the Induction Scheme which provided for the advertising of a grade to authentic upon retirement for retirement functions. The former warfare-disabled RSF may also are looking for repayment in phrases of a law of the Rhodesian parliament. In addition to the dissolution manner, PF veterans who had been on the assembly points and could not or did no longer want to enroll in the military were demobilized. While these veterans obtained questionnaires in the PA to fill out their profiles and preferred postwar occupations, no elaborate reintegration coverage turned into devised, apart from the provision of a Z $ 400 demobilization grant. The possibility to devise one is been misplaced. First level viable. The confined economic reintegration strategy has brought about the useless reintegration of those demobilized veterans, most of whom re-enlisted below the 1981 Demobilization Program [10]. 

Since the Lancaster House Accord did now not provide for practical disarmament, Robert Mugabe, then Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, defined the government's coverage of disarming veterans all through demobilization, while those looking forward to integration would preserve their guns. The ownership of guns by way of struggle veterans for the duration of the lengthy months of state of being inactive spent within the PA looking forward to integration and demobilization proved catastrophic, because the ZANU-ZAPU ethnic tensions spilled over from the war of liberation. The passage of time has now not healed the wounds, distrust and anxiety among ZANU and ZAPU; this took place in a context of incomprehensible Ndebele-Shona reconciliation. Apartheid South Africa, the main economic, political and navy pressure inside the vicinity, took benefit of those mutual hostilities to in addition make stronger the space among the 2 sides. 

Insecurity threats posed by the possession of weapons materialized inside the eventual clashes within the PA between ZANLA and ZIPRA. Veterans. After the essential Entumbane conflict of Sept. 11 November 1980, the authorities disarmed the guerrillas [13]. Perceiving disarmament as disparate and designed to strengthen the political and military electricity of the Shona, “many ZIPRA guerrillas have left the military and camps, becoming a member of the ranks of those armed contributors of the massive factors that is a reservoir of destiny destabilization. "These riots have been spontaneous and were now not part of ZAPU coverage [7]. However, Zimbabwe skilled armed dissident hobby in Matabeleland and elements of the Midlands from 1981 to 1987, at some stage in which some former ZIPRA veterans seized weapons towards the authorities.

The government spoke back to this inner security problem through deploying integrated military gadgets and the particularly created, North Korean educated 5th Brigade, additionally called Gukurahundi (Shona for ‘the rain that washes away the chaff from the last harvest, earlier than the spring rains’) to counter the ‘dissident’ risk [12]. An estimated 10,000 civilians misplaced their lives and thousands more have been harmed during the fifth Brigade’s marketing campaign, as violence and insecurity rocked Matabeleland and elements of the Midlands till the signing of the ancient Unity Accord of 1987 by using ZANU and ZAPU. This dealt a first-rate blow to post-independence peace, and to kingdom building and reconstruction.

Zimbabwe’s protection policy framework shifted, as it also needed to enhance its defences against apartheid South Africa’s ‘Total National Strategy’ against the ones southern African states that have been willing to Marxism and supportive of African liberation and ANC operatives. Total Strategy in component prescribed the navy equipping of the RENAMO surrogate forces, in addition to a few dissident elements that released incursions into Zimbabwe. Information that got here to light at some point of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission discovered the South African Defence Force’s involvement in Zimbabwe [14]. 

Force expansion and official procurement of arms gained momentum in order to safeguard newly-won independence by ensuring an efficient, well-equipped defence force. This was an enforced antithesis to demilitarisation [15]. The resultant increase of the army by 10,000 to 51,519 was accompanied by constant and substantial defence expenditure. The relegation of DDR meant that the envisaged peace dividend, which should have been characterised by the release of resources for social and economically productive projects, remained elusive.

Demobilisation Policy of 1981-1983: Demobilise and Scatter?

he integration manner has ended in a new army of round 70,000, towards a preliminary projected target of 30,000. The economic and security objectives supported the authorities’ political choice to devise and put into effect the demobilization of the oversized army. The authorities hooked up the Demobilization Directorate in July 1981, certainly below the Ministry of Labor and Social Security, to enforce demobilization and reintegration with the applicable ministries. The demobilization coverage did no longer consist of precise provisions for the rehabilitation and reintegration of special categories including ex-fighters with bodily disabilities and mental disorders and warfare veterans, all with unique desires [14]. The demobilization software, described in a policy file titled "Demobilization within the National Army of Zimbabwe", revolved around the provision of:

• Further training for those demobilised veterans who had not finished their number one or secondary schooling and wished to hold

• Technical schooling in motor mechanics, welding, agricultural guides, clinical courses, nearby governance, customs and immigration

• Expert guidance to war veterans interested by searching for employment, self-employment, or forming co-operatives; and

• A demobilisation allowance comprising a month-to-month stipend of Z$185 unfold over a 12 months duration, or a lump sum of Z$4,440

Former veterans hired were no longer entitled to the demobilization allowance [15]. Demobilized veterans acquired accounting books from the Postal Savings Bank and identity papers authorizing them to withdraw demobilization subsidies from banks across the country. By the cease of the bodily demobilization exercising in June 1983, 35,763 veterans had been demobilized (Table 1).

Despite the existence of a directorate dedicated to demobilization, there were programmatic and institutional gaps. These included the lack of a broad and consistent socioeconomic profile of veterans, the lack of implementation of financial management skills training for the many war veterans with no money management (demobilization) experience, incompetent and corrupt management staff, absence of enterprises or cooperative support mechanisms and the lack of a proactive monitoring mechanism. 

Most veterans' businesses have collapsed as a result of these factors, while farms have also been hit hard by the drought. War veterans had been "thrown into a sophisticated world without proper training" [16]. Aggravated by unfavorable post-independence economic, social and politico-military contexts, the DDR process has disintegrated. This has resulted in the absence of a dedicated reintegration policy on the part of the government, which has had a profound impact on the economic, social and political configuration of the independent state [17]. Despite these obvious programmatic limitations, the government of Zimbabwe stressed that "those (the war veterans) who had not advanced their education or acquired some skills or training, or were unemployed, would be left on their own after payments (of demobilization).) " [16]. 

In 1990, up to 25,000 war veterans were unemployed as indicators of human insecurity dominated their livelihoods. Since the government did not initiate any further reintegration aid beyond the ill-fated 1981 program, war veterans perceived this as an official contempt for their plight. Instead of turning war veterans into productive civilians, the (ineffective) GDR turned them into war veterans, an identity they would then violently mobilize to achieve various goals. The Zimbabwe National Liberation War Veterans Association (ZNLWVA), established after the 1987 Unity Agreement between ZANU and ZAPU, has offered war veterans the platform to launch their demands.

The wave of discontent and the threat to national stability posed by dissatisfied and ineffectively reinstated war veterans erupted in 1997. This followed the Zimbabwean government's suspension of the Compensation

Table 1: Post-Demobilisation Veteran Status

Source: Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe Parliamentary Debates, v 18, no. 68, March 1992

Fund for War Victims (established by the government in 1980 to treat all war wounded.) in March 1997, and the appointment by President Mugabe of a judicial commission to investigate and report on the administration of the Fund. The suspension was intended to stop further abuses of the fund, but nonetheless, understandably, angered many war veterans, as the fund had become their most important escape route from the homeless, following problematic reintegration. This created an explosive situation and the government soon found itself at odds with disgruntled war veterans who continually protested the perception of bureaucratic failure and mistreatment [14]. 

In response to the demonstrations, the government implemented the "second policy". demobilization and reintegration ". Coincidentally, the president is also the patron of the ZNLWVA. The relationship between the ruling ZANU PF and the war veterans has consistently been characterized by "power-seeking programs, their demands for revolutionary liberation, their use of violence and intimidation" and their "simultaneous conflict and collaboration when the party and veterans manipulate each other." [11] The costs of this program, including an initial outlay of over Z $ 4.5 billion in lifetime bonuses and pensions for over 52,000 veterans, and the negative impact on economy Overall, they meant that Zimbabwe did not suffer the financial dividends of the GDR. To date, the government bears the burden of veterans' pensions, which must constantly adjust to keep up with rampant hyperinflation.

This document mentioned Zimbabwe's joy for the GDR. The GDR presented Zimbabwe's transition to independence and democracy, following negotiated agreements on long anti-colonial armed struggles. The transition environment, characterized by mutual historical distrust and animosity, as well as the previous dynamics of conflict motivated the establishment of the Unitary Public Battle Militia and the GDR. the resulting insecurity and uncertainty posed challenges for integration and the GDR. 

The GDR was the other side of the logically strategic establishment of unified and legitimate national defense forces that were essential for peace and nation building. However, the strategic imperatives of the rapid status quo of the incorporated national defense forces and the demobilization of superfluous defense forces. parties to the conflict, the equally crucial issue of the reintegration of the GDR has changed and has been inadequately addressed. Government-led reintegration techniques have been poorly implemented where coverage claims were in place, although they have worsened after rethinking. This effectively created a gap between the 2 D's of DDR (disarmament and demobilization) and the R (reintegration). Despite the reality that some former warring parties comfortably managed wardrobes, authorities, parastate and diplomatic posts, the sustainable reintegration of the main former parties of the war of liberation remained a nuisance. Governments that failed to adequately reinstate veterans were subsequently seen with a charge to pay, as restless former opponents threatened national balance. This has become a pink flag that national authorities can hardly ever want to ignore, following the implementation of numerous new reintegration initiatives. Although GDR occurs in particular environments, the following general suggestions can be taken in the case of Zimbabwe and should be kept in mind when undertaking future methods.

• Crafters and implementers of DDR ought to understand the dynamics of the previous conflict of which the procedure is a product

• DDR must be a fundamental a part of the peace negotiations, agreement and succeeding peace process

• There's a strong need to conceive DDR as an interconnected and integrated procedure with no gap among the two Ds and the R

• The various stakeholders must observe a comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable technique with regard to DDR

• The reformulation of the wider financial framework is important, due to the fact DDR is not going to succeed in a stagnant or imbalanced economic system

• Proper countrywide reconciliation ought to be nurtured, as DDR symbiotically relates to post-war accommodation among former antagonists

• Remedial measures that don't disrupt the countrywide financial fabric must be devised

• Ensuring the human safety of ex-opponents via effective DDR helps regime and countrywide protection, permitting DDR to reap its promise of helping peace constructing

• While UN peacekeeping operations may additionally have genuine mandates to put in force underneath detailed timeframes, there's a need to make sure continuity thru post-withdrawal synergy with applicable neighborhood our bodies

1. Mashike, L. and M.Mokalobe. “Reintegration into Civilian Life: The Case of Former MK and APLA Veterans.” Track Two, vol. 12, no. 1, 2014.

2. Mazarire, G., and M.R.Rupiya. “Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: A Critical Assessment of Zimbabwe’s Demobilisation and Reintegration Programmes, 1980–2000.” Journal of Peace, Conflict and Military Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, 2000.

3. Mashike, L. “‘You Are a Time Bomb’: War Veterans in Post-Conflict South Africa.” Society in Transition, vol. 35, no. 1, 2004, pp. 87.

4. Werbner, R. Tears of the Dead: The Social Biography of an African Family. Baobab, 1992, pp. 159.

5. Rupiya, M. “Demobilisation and Integration: ‘Operation Merger’ and the Zimbabwe National Defence Forces, 1980–1987.” Dismissed: Demobilisation and Reintegration of Former Veterans in Africa, edited by J. Cilliers, 2004.

6. Campbell, H. Reclaiming Zimbabwe: The Exhaustion of the Patriarchal Model of Liberation. New Africa Books, 2003, pp. 51.

7. Howard, L.S. “UN Peace Implementation in Namibia: The Causes of Success.” International Peacekeeping, vol. 9, no. 1, 2002, pp. 109.

8. Martin, D., and P.Johnson. Apartheid Terrorism: The Destabilisation Report. James Currey, 1989, pp. 51–76.

9. Werbner, R. “Smoke from the Barrel of a Gun: Post-Wars of the Dead, Memory and Reinscription in Zimbabwe.” Zed Books, 1998.

10. Bhebe, N. and T.Ranger. Soldiers in Zimbabwe’s Liberation War. vol. 1, University of Zimbabwe Publications, 1995.

11. Thornberry, C. A Nation Is Born: The Inside Story of Namibia’s Independence. Gamsberg Macmillan Publishers, 2004, pp. 125.

12. Colleta, N.J. Beyond Repatriation: The Demobilisation and Reintegration of War Veterans in Namibia, 2010, pp. 21.

13. Krieger, N. Guerilla Veterans in Post-War Zimbabwe: Symbolic and Violent Politics, 1980–1987. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

14. Mhanda, A. “Individual Demobilization and Reintegration Process in Colombia: Implementation, Challenges and Former Combatants’ Perspectives.” Intervention, 2011.

15. Nyasha, S., and B.Row. “‘Four Years of Armed Struggle in Zimbabwe.’” Third World, Second Sex: Women’s Struggles and National Liberation, edited by M. Davies, Zed Books, 2010.

16. Nyathi, N. and F.Hoffman. Tomorrow Is Built Today: Experiences of War, Colonialism and the Struggle for Collective Co-operatives in Zimbabwe. Amvil, 1990.

17. Frankel, P. Soldiers in a Storm: The Armed Forces in South Africa’s Democratic Transition. Westview Press, 2000.