The universe evolution is apparently implicit happening, not needing cause, coherence and scope, unless for the earthy anomalies, bringing in spot animation and cognition, i.e., alert mobility and aware thinking. The liveliness supplies self-rule actuation and movement; the knowledge provides ensemble understanding and judgment, as local modification of the prior natural settings, sy:

• The animated stuffs, granting effecting and driving capabilities to bystanders
• The cognition packs, supplying thinking and reasoning to the mental worlds

The anomalies, life and mind, differ from the time-varying environs, by plans and logics. The conscious appraisal follows the agentive alertness; these are individual virtues, not shared by the generic environs, which does not denote distinctiveness, opposed to deterministic courses. The ‹life› and ‹mind› formations are singularities, starting activity/vigilance and intellection/reasoning and instigating actors and judges. The anomalies manifested on the earth: we, precisely, do not know when and why; we, only, have guesses:

• The life and mind have generating instructions, contained In the galactic information
• The life and mind are confined singularities, happened on earth, without universality

The propositions oppose permanent determinism to alert consciousness; the latter is, perhaps, has start with life and mind; it, otherwise, can be attribute of the universe, typified by the coherence of laws, i.e., by rational changes or wise controls. The vigilance on and cognition of what happens around us are current practices. The alert and conscious links show varying environs that we are able to describe, to perform acts and to modify the course of events. The actuation, reasoning, judging, designing and accomplishing seem routine competences, with the further ability of verifying the ensuing results. The actuation and cognizance appear talents allotted to men; the sharing by the surrounds or parts of the all are not obvious.

The narration provides evocations and suggestions, when we try to understand and justify the alertness and awareness abilities of negligible actors in the huge galactic universe, apparently without watchfulness and mindfulness. Lacking truthful explanations, we can envisage possible justifying reasons, perhaps, inner natural qualities or upper conditioning spiritual causes. The fancy depictions are arbitrary, even if plausible; when the ecology seems assigning bounds to the human civilisation, arrived at its end, we may devise new reasonable readings, supplying hopeful sustainability to further growth. The optimistic views entail:

• The faiths in inner qualities or upper conditions possessed and enabled by the reality
• The projection of aids, allowing lasting efficiency and recovery options to humankind

Along the former way, the civilisation is just outcome of total reasons, showing the presence of cosmic rationality or the existence of godly wisdom. Lacking one or the other faith, we need limit our focus on the human intelligence and linked alertness and cognition skills. These are, however, oddities not less than the natural rationality or holy wisdom, dealing with wholly chaotic and unconscious galactic layouts. The men cognition seems telling us that our contingent knowledge can turn in total science; our devised activity can become absolute betterment [1-29]. The replacing of given faiths, with other devotions does not seem actual advantage; it just offers alternative readings, leaving open the query about the related plausibility. Yet, the links between the recalled faiths and devotions are questionable; probably, it is better looking at the whole anomalies along fused views, mixing cognition and alertness skills with the contingent/total pair. 

Alert Intelligent Courses 

The alert intelligence is earth’s anomaly in the universe, with life and cognition, enabling actuation and thinking processes. The humankind is way, specialising hands (adroitness) and minds (thoughtfulness) that allows planning and performing conscious jobs, which, helpfully, modify and trim the surrounds, to more friendly settings; the mindful work leads to progress by dexterity and proficiency, with outcomes judging. The bottom up solution moves from biology, generating biotic and organic materials. The cognizance is collection of knowledge and narrations, supplying concepts, imagens, judgments and decision. The mental ideas distinguish the fancy accounts, from to the material supports:

• The Abstract Processed Data: Encoded contents, supplying thinking and reasoning elements
• The Tangible Processing Stuffs: Neural nets, with acquisition and restitution learned courses

The outcome is enriched reality, encompassing mind contents of the individuals and already settled and stored knowledge in mind formats and, profitably, in suited permanent databases. In enriched reality, the items handle with their encoded readings. Men, by cognition and knowledge invention, make clear, how encrypting widens picked perceptions by allotted meanings. In the databases, the information enjoys the given definition; the narrations just avail of the allotted meanings and out ‹knowledge› deals with abstract readings, according to the ensemble agreed imports. The detailed cognition process has contingent worth, leading to many native idioms, later transmitted by parental teaching. The independent inventions relate to the same reality; the parallel lexica have translation, recovering the original restitution. The databases and languages can have standard conversions: the independent descriptions show reality unicity; the stability of the physical depictions offers causal extrications of events and provides theoretic models for the trends.

At the point, from the contingent ‹knowledge›, our hopeful mood, as said, suggests two ways:

• Faiths in inner quality or upper reality, giving total worth to intelligent courses and upshots
• Recourse to our alert minds, to design and to implement aware and effective progress plans

The cosmic rationality or godly wisdom presumed by the former way allows looking at the human minds, as outcome of or inspired by galactic information; the guess lets expecting further intelligence ways on similar plants and or other synthetic hands/mins for similar issues. The shift wilderness-to-civilisation could occur differently, whenever fit abstract separation of ‹knowledge› and job planning bring to the technical and social alteration, with known ambling alertness/consciousness, through:

• Manufacture methods, fulfilling changes, after identification/utilisation of physical laws
• Relational methods, supplying social organisations and political setups to all populations

The finding of manufacture and relational methods follows the practice of imagining objects and facts, and rezoning on them. The analyses, bringing to separating ‹knowledge› (encoded data) from the carriers, have the known multiple readings, which of fancy mental exercises:

• The conceiving of abstract narrations of items/acts/facts, which spot the material reality
• The existence of upper spiritual reality, which inspires/supports the material alterations
• The presence of inner coherence qualities, which enable/describe the current variations

The cognition allows figuring out pictures and tales, which duplicate what observed, by accounts. This mental activity follows abstraction and encrypting steps, factually, requiring parental teaching, after the quizzical start. To avoid the initial puzzle, we might have faith in the existence of the holy reality, dealing with spiritual events; alternatively, we may believe that the matter has intrinsic attributes, which qualify as cosmic details, when detected. The handling and makeover of ‹knowledge› let discovering physical assets, identifying spiritual entities or cosmic qualities, as total information. The ‹knowledge›, then, appears having several readings: human specifics, spiritual entities and cosmic qualities. The abstraction and encoding of items/acts/facts particulars, as already noted, lead to many native idioms, for contingent statements, thus, no global communication establishes, since the total encrypting requires a godly or natural language; the absence of total communication makes uncertain, the godly wisdom existence or the cosmic rationality presence. However, these facts are faiths: we easily can aim at a global semantic or we look at the digital computer encoding as total communication. The question remains open; the analyses shall go further and investigating if and how the human ‹knowledge› may transform in galactic information.

The hold and modelling of physical data request scientific knowhow, technology proficiency and practical expertise: the manufacture methods aim at innovations by theoretic doctrines/rubrics, say, the emerging cultural inventions because of agreed symbols-and-meanings (description of natural items and facts). The setting and assembly of collective bodies and civic circles ask suited emerging of communal choices with managerial layouts because of their shared interactions (after coding and enacting). The relational methods are human invention, but the upper or inner inspiration is plausible guess. The technical (or manufacture) and social (or relational) methods appear modifying wilderness, into civilisation, with technology enhancers and personal acquaintance: sciences, legality and authority are common aids. On the earth, the biology brings the anomaly of the animated stuffs; the cognizance, the anomaly of abstract processing packages, ensuing in improved reality with encrypted ‹knowledge›. The analyses about the earthy anomalies move around how explaining the improved reality of the civilisation, better detailing the growth formation by technical inventions (manufacture methods) and social institutions (relational methods) [30-46], now, the analyses shall further face the progress sustainability by rescue/recovery devices (ecology methods). The perceived growth formation and progress sustainability openly resort to the human ‹knowledge›, which supports the design and accomplishment duties, converting wilderness, in cultural attainments, say, in enhanced reality.

Progress Myth

The enhancement analyses, basically, enjoy two phases, say, growth myth and sustainable growth; and they prospect two readings, say, contingent or total ‹knowledge›. The survey, to recall the growth mane features, shall start from the fabled details of the existing earthy civilization. Our depiction gives central position to the human intelligence, maybe, directly, or with upper/inner backdrops. The progress myth, simply, expresses the trust in the design and implementation proficiency originated by anthropic sources. That aptitude ensue from the merging of talents, alloying the selection of improvements and the rejection of drawbacks; the talents, however do not suffice; we, further, need creativity, to get innovative advances that increase the earthy life quality. The inventive resourcefulness is critical requisite, along two ways:

• Contingent intellect, linked to proficiency in enabling actually inventive transformations
• Total cognizance, supplied by inner/upper causes, to select processes for fit innovations

By the former way, the human intelligence has complete capability and adeptness; by the latter, the intelligence replicates galactic competence; the frame, actually is more tricky. The civilisation is insignificant fact in the galactic environs; the all describes men’s views, assembled as ‹knowledge›, sets of symbols, with clan’s agreed meanings. When the ‹knowledge› links to the spotted natural items or facts, we are dealing with physical depictions; when the narrations of the many clans are equivalent, we may believe that we have identified actual qualities of the reality, i.e., that the surrounds enjoy galactic information and out tales are trustful. When the mental worlds acknowledge the actual rationality of the detected ‹knowledge›, we may expect wise steering or the existence of spiritual spheres, conditioning the material reality. Else, the rationality and wisdom, after the alleged ‹knowledge›, are whimsical guesses or collective concepts, without real foundations.

The galactic reality does not need acknowledgment; no information may qualify the matter: the chaos is free from rationality or wisdom. The start of agentive and thinking stuff is gratuitous singularity: alertness or consciousness is open event, not already set. The instigation of intelligence, without natural rationality or godly wisdom, is possibility with complex authenticity that takes in tangible and incorporeal entities, notably contingent ‹knowledge›, qualifying items, acts and facts (at least, on the earth). The prospective scenarios clearly start from addressing the human intelligence, include natural rationality or holy wisdom:

• Human contingent cognition, aimed at technical knowledge/social acquaintance formation
• Galactic information discovery, which allows trusting in the total truth of the physical laws
• Separation of spiritual spheres, which allot wise ruling to material rational transformations

We may detect the rationality of the cosmos trends and we infer the physical laws. We cannot perceive the separation of a holy reality, because we belong to the material one. The inherent rationality of the material spheres needs passing through ‹knowledge›, thus, the cognition process, to define the meaningful traits of what perceived: as said, we infer the result by comparing knowledge independent acquisitions. The holy roots need transcendence hypothesis, moving the control out of the material spheres. The presence of galactic information or existence of spiritual reality gives foundations to ‹knowledge›: the cognition is not mere contingent invention; it detects total truths. The statements cannot have proof; the one is tautology (being just a definition); the other is ontology claim (for the unconditional existence) and they need faiths. Without galactic information or spiritual ruling, reference to true physical laws is quizzical: we need further facts, to explore the effects of the human doings, with utilisation of the spotted scientific ‹knowledge›.

The alertness and cognizance courses, however, typify the human civilization: the manufacture methods start technology innovations; the relational methods enable political setups. This suffices to believe in lasting progress, promoting the growth myth. At the globalism, moreover, we may look after recovery methods, to perform effective recycling and reclamation duties, perhaps, with the robot assistance. This evaluation has factual evidence with empirical trials; the three methods are hypothetical appraisal on a posteriori events, until when our intelligence finds proficient solutions. The alertness and cognizance trails, with or without natural or spiritual effects in the backdrop, enjoy prising narrations. The following analyses use the growth schema to find out potential issues and critical problems, once keeping the approach:

• Technical knowledge, which supports innovations, exploiting sources from the physical reality
• Social acquaintance, which implements political setups of friendly, legal and ordered societies
• Ecologic sustainability, which balances right earthy sources’ exploitation and wastes’ disposal

The manufacture, relational and recovery methods are odd competences: their explanation is obvious, if we may resort to natural rationality or godly wisdom; without one or other, the elucidation needs finding the soundness of the actually implemented contingent plans. Science and economy supply total coherence to technical laws and social principles, but with passing appraisal worth; ecology is consistent foundation, but the rescue pans just profit of the universe/earth dosimetry, to move hitched from the planer, but we do not have no certainty about the galalactic steadiness. The analyses in the following do not solve the pointed out ambiguities; these need having here mention, to stress on the growth myth.

Technology Innovation 

Alert and conscious modes allow addressing growth, as said, using details and models of the interactions with outside Men acquire ‹knowledge›, observing the surrounds and other men; they develop scientific and practical descriptions, providing causal frames, through which inferring the transformation of the natural phenomena. The picked up metaphors are meaningful at the clan range, availing of locally agreed symbols and readings. However, as said, the detected causal frames appear being natural characteristics, spotting pieces of galactic information: the descriptions, locally agreed by each clan, actually, shall define picked items and facts. The ‹knowledge› contains the useful data for conceiving the worthwhile improvements. Along the ages, we register notable step ahead, which the humankind, compared to the other living beings, due to the especial dexterity, resourcefulness and proficiency outcomes:

• The manufacture methods typify by personal proficiency aimed at art and crat facility
• The agrarian advance widens to new biology areas the manmade productive effecting
• The industrial improvement brands by controlled efficiency of the activity organisation

The hand adroitness and mind ingenuity of the single individuals lead to the manufacture methods, through which the men design and implement new artefacts, from clothes and apparels, to homes and bridges. The inventiveness leads, also, at acknowledging the biology potentials for prearranged breeding and husbandry, turning wild lands, into agrarian facilities. Then, the expertise shall theorise the productive processes out of the human contexts, aiming at mere effectiveness, later, corrected by economy and ecology restraints. The three achievements define conventional technology innovations, bringing to the:

• Clothing Revolution: Archaic layout of garbed societies, living in aptly built houses
• Agrarian Revolution: Old structure of settled societies, fed by breeding and farming
• Industrial Revolution: Coming setup of open societies, aimed at robot-aided being

The last accomplishments, here, specify today incompletely settled arrangements, since the ecology limits still loosely apply. These have later presentations, in the section on the ecology sustainability. Presently, we discuss the technicalities of practical innovation, allowing relevant improves by material transformations. In the survey, we expect using human ‹knowledge› as direct way, which exploits alertness and cognizance and establish civil resources. On the earth, the life and intelligence are singularities, which start local animation and awareness. Then, the gene evolution, along biology processes, promotes adaptive lifeform trails, and the meme fruition, along cognition procedure, enables detection, description and judgment abilities. Both, biology and cognition are, perhaps, part of the galactic information or they denote parallel spiritual entities. The singularities are, maybe, natural stochastic events or holy manifestations.

The life begins agentive abilities, keeping self-acting autonomy, from birth, to death. The alertness of local biology beings is oddity, with the possibility parallel new changes. The cognition starts thinking talents, with personal discernment and ensemble learning fads, through abstraction and encrypting operations. The self-acting and reasoning autonomies bring to humankind oddness, which achieves design and decision-making. The manufacture methods specifies the human capability to recognise the extant enviros, to detect the right knowledge and to implement the correct improvements, modifying the earlier wilderness:

• The personal discrimination, figuring out example improvements, for enhanced wellbeing
• The ensemble learning, devising the manmade practical alterations and helpful artefacts
• The aware progression, aptly avoiding the drawbacks and acknowledging the advantages

The manmade accomplishments are hard to classify, whether belonging to the natural setting. Noting what occurs around us, we distinguish the existence of causal trends and the possibility of getting data for apparent enhancements. In addition, the behind planning reflects decisional capabilities; this does not just marks the deterministic sequels of the original galactic trends. These deceptive upshots need revision: the singularities bringing to the men, if natural, imply overall galactic rationality of the material backdrop; if spiritual, entail wise ruling of upper controls. At least, the options need deepening [47-76].

Production Trail

Back to the apparent effects of factual exploitation of practical ‹knowledge›, the technology innovations are essential way, to generate basic supplies and useful means. The conventional descriptions, moreover, define throughout changes or revolutions that, when happened, radically upgrade the involved societies, compared to the surrounding cultures. On the earth, the civilisations typical breaks are the above said:

• The Clothing Revolution: Men are animals, tallying wears and apparels for daily comfort
• The Agrarian revolution: Men systemically accomplish farming and breeding operations
• The Industrial Revolution: Men organise the activity schedules, under aware task control

The resort to ingenuity and adroitness lead to the manufacture trail, which identifies the conception and making phases of manmade merchandises and inventions, which supply basic comfort and shelter to the naked human bodies. The planned recourse to natural produces leads to agriculture, practicing purposeful farming. The production process have profitable descriptions by work cycles, i.e., strictly scheduled activity organisations. Fist, the opportunity is evident in manufacturing; this starts the ‹industry steps›, gradually widening the activity organisation to other human interests. The conventional trail covers:

• Industry First Step: The on line hands dexterity has to perform optimal work schedules
• Industry Second Step: The full mechanisation runs according to the highest throughput
• Industry Third Step›: Synthetic hands and minds adapt delivery, to customers’ requests
• Industry Fourth Step: The robotic solutions apply to all, management/practical, duties
• Industry Fifth Step: The robot-like accomplishment/control runs under eco-constraints

The manufacture methods typify by hands-and-minds, joining design with actuation, say, judgments with deftness. The garbed societies apply peculiar practices, quickly enabling sophisticated identities and social hierarchies. This repeats with dwellings and monuments, marking the separation of leaders and heads. The agrarian setups oblige the yearly control and seasonal ownership of harvests, allotting chattels and parting assets and tasks between singles, families and clans. The community hierarchies, soon, ask public orders with allied citizens and rival foreigners. The all requires enacting civic laws and stipulating official treaties. The agrarian revolution, as previously, may begin resorting to rural modes, but it develops shared upshots, which shape the collective behaviours. After the manufacture, the rural modes may have, as well, inner or upper origins or inspirations, making instrumental, the human involvement.

The narrations, quite obviously, bring to the synthetic hands-and-minds, i.e., to specify the robot modes, which equivalently accomplish human design and handling tasks. The transitions to civilisation shows clear stages: aware goal selection for enhanced wellness and expert accomplishment for avoiding fallouts. These require on process intelligence, to adapt the scheduling, according to ongoing settings. Wellness upgrading is permanent objective: this shall avoid parallel snags; the effecting has to deal with instant acknowledged backstage. The advances, when looking at technology innovations, entail essential upturns:

• The front end ingenuity/adroitness of men, allowing inventing/making focused artefacts
• The acknowledgement of biology routes to create foodstuffs, via self-agentive processes
• The by-line of planned thought/dexterous options altering the inborn deterministic tends

The three lines are man centred, showing, however, the essential guidance of physical drivers, material supplies and tangible constraints, with, at all rank, the pertinent technical characteristics. The manufacture methods, biology phenomena and activity organisations have perhaps inner/upper or just outer rules that do not fall in the free selection of men; rather, they need complying scientific/technical restraints. The fetters manifest, possibly, with wobble or loose bounds; they, as well, may operate as implicit inputs or wonders, overlapping the human wills. The prospect advises that the origins of sciences and technologies bypass the human ‹knowledge›, having natural or spiritual foundations at the galactic information range. The science and technical views or scenarios, then, acquire total consistency, allotting alike reliability to the contingent human ‹knowledge›, as soon as parallel, but independent clans agree about the detected data truth.

Technical Prospects

The total truth of the discovered physical laws is important attainment, assuring apt connotation to the technology innovation. The ensuing enhancements modify the current life conditions, protecting the folks, widening the food fonts and swelling the processing effects. The standard references, once again, consider the conventional domains of personal care, food safety and job proficiency:

• The clothing revolution, covering bodies by dresses, followed by sheltering people by houses
• The agrarian revolution, managing domestic wild species, for men controlled food providing
• The industrial revolution, improving supply chain efficacy, by work plans and robotic tooling

The men’s hands-ad-minds are frond end instrumental aids, together with the gears and tools, conceived and prepared for effecting the conceived transformations of the environs. Up to now, these have human execution, but the civilisation deployment require the availability of apt artefacts, husbandry produces and trade managing: the improvements depend on these results, not on the actual performers.  The advances, from wilderness, allow the garbed societies, agrarian wellbeing and business effectiveness: the associated technologies are prerequisites, no mind how and who accomplish the duties. On the earth, we have the life and cognizance singularities and the human intelligence accomplishments: these supply factual actors, yet equivalent attainment are possible elsewhere by different ways. Today, we are aware that the earthy facts are thrifty happenings, not affecting the universe trends: we cannot use our viewpoints: on the contrary, we need accepting the complete determinism of what occurs around us, already fixed by causes, which do not depend on our will and power.

At this point, the listed technology revolutions are insignificant ripple, if trimming on a thrifty planet; they are relevant occurrence, if the underlying technical ‹knowledge› is not just human invention, rather galactic information. Around us, the reality describes as ‹cosmos›, a distribution of stuff, with assigned order: the all shows matter interacting with energy, termed by information, with details and laws. The ‹knowledge› is men’s construction, with contingent worth. The progress is, surely, technical result due to revolutions. The agrarian one aims at systematic resort to ‹life› processes, to multiply the available resources, by intentional farming by planned breeding and professional husbandry. The industrial one looks at organised scheduling of the work activity, starting from the manufacture scientific planning; it knows variations, to switch at intelligent plans, to include robot aids and to widen the accomplished business out of manufacture field. The planning of biology processes and the effective work scheduling show that the human adroitness and intellect are self-sufficient aids, inventing the tasks means and programming arts and crafts for conscious progress. However, similar attainments are also possible through transformations, having inner or upper causes and with or without men’s support or cooperation.

The intent is to limit the men anomaly: the galactic information already fully specifies the civilisation and related improvements; these latter might have equivalent construction, bypassing men and life/intelligence singularities. The human intelligence, giving ‹knowledge› and awareness, is not just earthy distinctiveness: it is peculiar issue of the cosmic rationality, due to the overall material reality, or of the godly wisdom, due to the holy governance of the material frames. ‹Knowledge› formation and growth planning, if autonomous abilities, build contingent outcomes; intrinsic information or spiritual control allows total way. The technical headway opens queries: access to physical laws, backed by natural rationality or holy wisdom, supplies apt understanding, to devise right advances and aware checks. The ‹knowledge› trustfulness is result of the shared understanding, proving that plots and models have origin from the same things, acts or facts in the real world. Then, the detected science happens rightly identifying the fit galactic information. The process authenticates abstraction and encrypting of the environs. Distinctly, the ‹knowledge› arises with unbiased worth and autonomous setting, once suited agreement establishes among the experts.

Political Settings 

In the civilisation, the technology innovations run parallel with political organisations: the former ruled by manufacture, the latter by relational methods. The men are social animals, sharing current life, in families, clans and tribes. The technical and social developments, both, accomplish upturns, when fully new setups need start, wholly modifying the previous arrangements. We distinguish three typical societies:

• Disperse groups, wandering on earth, seeking virgin lands and discovering free resources
• Tribes settled into known countries and progressively claiming and stating soil ownership
• People restrained in official settlements, struggling to conquer better governance setups

The situations define, distinguishing three collective breakthroughs, when the earth has undecided lords, when nation states institute or when migrants fight established privileges. These collective breakthroughs lead to specialise the civil societies and the transition rules among them:

• The Marginal Self-Sufficiency: With roaming tribes, establishing detached leaderships
• The Split-Autonomy: With formation of competing closed societies, aimed at headship
• The Global Liability: With similar self-rule citizens wholly exploiting earth’s resources

We have lost the memory of the roaming tribes and we yet do not fuly conceive how the ‹global village› establishes; the nation state formalisms are dominant settings, competing to get supremacy and wealth, as if autonomy and split-sovereignty authorise each one interests. The personal onuses and interstate duties emerge, when the ecology obliges the resource and waste visibility, making evident the imbalance, arising with over depletion and over pollution. The global responsibility bins all inhabitants and states and obliges the worldwide communities, when the globalism collective breakthrough occurs:

• Scattered Populations: Nomadic tribes, changing homelands, aiming at foodstuffs
• Settled Countries: Split-sovereign ‹nation states›, fighting for conquest/supremacy
• Earth Fullness: Uniform contacts and trades ‹global village›, under ecology checks

The earth is finite planer, not allowing the autonomy/split-sovereignty myth. Today, intense exploitation of raw sources and disposal of trashes bring to the supply exhaustion and litter corruption, unless massive backward logistic systematically apply, completely modifying the earlier manufacturing cycle. The so-called ‹circular economy›, however, is not possible (contradicted by the entropy law): residual irreversible effects always persist. The backward logistic can, perhaps, can get rewards from interstellar places, since we can plan space missions. The three collective breakthroughs originate properly different civic organisations: the spread, regular and uniform societies, notably, characterised by self-sufficiency, competitive and mutual competence and efficacy. The social institutions are sophisticated communal engagements, with assigned public roles and duty, established by official laws and forced by governing authorities. The political setups [77-108] are necessary complement of the technology innovations: together they typify the civilisation enrichments that switch wilderness, into friendly environs.

Relational Scenarios

The sociable environments build on the relational methods, enjoyed by individuals and collectives. We hve easily accepted the manufacture methods, supplying effective interactions with the tangible layouts; the men disposition, to interact into communities towards shared objectives, shows layered stricture:

• The personal communication sphere allows civilian understanding and interacting
• The indorsed lawfulness rank allows transactions, keeping right business dealings
• The pubic headship layer brings in the operation autonomy of nation assemblies

At the front level, the contacts add meaningfulness, by abstract inventions and agreed signs. At the clan level, cooperation and trade occurs within legality. At the assembly level, the inter-group regularity needs leadership and government apportionments. The communication, market and management are the layers deserving enacted regulatory tools. The regular societies create standard, specifying:

• The interpersonal contacts, creating native languages for the local mutual understanding
• The economic foundation, enacting rules, for the impartial regulation of the transactions
• The headship establishment, prospecting government effectiveness by sanctioned edicts

The regular societies are autonomous sovereign ‹nation states›, with own government and growth aims. The all establishes a conflictual ensemble, with main countries and dominions, conquests and revolts, up to balanced situations, with frozen alliances and rivalries. By the localism, the relational methods lead to split-sovereign regular societies, which enable peculiar three layer structures:

• The colloquial framework, when communication is ultimate interpersonal link
• The business offstage, when economics is dealt with by legal trade regulations
• The political backdrop, when government requires enacting official protocols

The nation states are closed societies, with separation of citizens, from foregoers; three layers formalise each countries; interstate treaties sanction the extant powers and local supremacies, and reflected benefits of the linked citizens. The aliens, migrants and refugees have marginal statuses, until suited integration into indorsed countries occurs. The depictions show stroppy situations: the democracies assume having free and equal citizens, which, voting, elect heads and governments; however, expats, exiles or evacuees need the acquisition of official recognitions and papers: no rights exist, without citizenship. The oddness requests automatisms: the newborn baby has the nationality of the parents (ius sanguini) or of the native country (ius soli). The automatisms, perhaps, disputable, onetime allow planning the baby’s nationality; the way is little chance for the many expatriates and emigrants looking after enhanced settlement in richer countries.

The nation state parting is bottom up issue of localism, based on ethnic, racial or cultural reasons; fit folk renovation exploits loose boundaries and conquests; the setting of the late regular societies has worsened all adaptive practices and emigration/immigration becomes critical interstate questions. The nation states have consolidated traditions, not questioned by local migration facts; still, the overall state partition starts being analysed, if the justifying motives seem weak. However, the lack of autonomy and sovereignty shows the critical sort of the nation states and related borders.

Connected Liability

The study on the humankind assembling denotes the existence of interpersonal traits, the relational methods, which purposely implement interpersonal policies, adapted to the earthy life conditions:

• Social Nomadism: Animals and men start as wanderers, seeking partners and food to survive
• Social Regularity: Individuals and collectives enjoy autonomy, managed by sovereign settings
• Social Uniformity: The global village collects people in open groups, under ecology constraints

The primitive relational links aim at simple choices, without side conditions: the ranges characterise most animals, just opened to taming and domestication. The free decision range allows sophisticated three level patterns, supplying the above described regular society setups. The ecology restraints imply controlling the supply chains in view to grant steady provisioning of the uniform society, as each one has strictly bounded allocation. The three social arrangements differ, showing parallel tribes, rival countries and forced rally:

• Marginal autonomy, with conscious citizens emulating each one safe rescue/salvage habits
• Adept economy, with voluntary institutions controlling the issues’ suitability and efficiency
• Global village›, the unified authorities enact shared instructions, following official targets

The relational methods can develop bottom up regulations, if free of self-governing choices. The economy and political orders can have separate optimisations, with distinct resource allocation and power setting. The linked self-sufficiency leads to rival split-sovereign regular societies, but the regularity implies total steadiness: the earth is tiny location, with bounded sources and limited disposals. This stops the growth, even if refugees and evacuees could find suited settlement. The ‹global village› denotes current events:

• The Connectedness: Worldwide web linked people do not leave blind spot on the earth
• The Sustainability: Depletion and pollution need recycle and rescue for thrifty headway
• The Ecology Constraints: Current social setups involve uniform global village structures

The globalism replaces the localism. The authority shall follow the ecology imperatives, with account of the economy plans. The all is open defy, perhaps, bypassed, getting aids for the thrifty earth, not affecting the huge universe, through culture, transaction and recycle procedures:

• The interpersonal improvements, applied as instant rules, for technical and cultural alms
• The economic foundation, inventing market and trade options, to enhance goods’ supply
• The ecology establishment, prospecting recovery and salvage jobs, by standard schedules

The progress is practical achievement, joining agentive proficiency and cognizance selective operation, i.e., exploiting the human ‹knowledge› along aware trails; these presume explanation of acts and facts and ability of selecting consistent inferences. The progress, possibly, denotes the physical coherence, natural rationality or heavenly wisdom, of the universe; the collective breakthroughs and technical revolutions are milestones, which show upturns with total reasons. If this reading true, the globalism breakthrough, along the political trail, does not stops the headway; it designates the ‹global village› and linked ecology hitches.

Ecology Sustainability 

The earth/universe dissymmetry advises looking at total trails, when the contingent civilisation seems in critical conditions or at the end of the course. The human adventure is, possibly, temporary occurrence, but the natural rationality or godly wisdom, if attached to the galactic architectures, obliges exploring possible chances. At first, the views are not encouraging:

• The earth narrow bounds, limiting the available of raw sources and safe disposal litters
• The universe entropic progression, with the build-up of big decay and permanent snag

Exhaustion and contamination will inexorably affect our planer. Entropy is unavoidable physical law. The progress is oddness, unless, actually, the cosmic rationality or the wisdom overlaps the all-tangible layout, adding intangible benefits. The presence of galactic rationality or wisdom is gratuitous assumption, hinted by the human civilisation attainments wit technology innovations and political deployments, the latter, for instance, show intrinsic, spiritual, or original features, specialising the headship architectures:

• The Natural Causation: Immanent control applies, deciding out Darwinism leaders
• The Holy Lineage: Spiritual rulings affect the souls, with guides for each community
• The Self-Ruling: Democratic poll assures representative governance to nation-state

The genetic Darwinism, holy authority or individual self-rule appears weird trait, enabled by built-in peculiarities, at immanent, transcendent or conditional stances. When obliged to face the sustainability hitches, the a priori characteristics are conditioning drivers, modifying the current outcomes:

• The universe has laws and updating facts: the men aware aids are doubtful quarries
• The universe has overall ruling laws, not modifiable by instant drawback or progress
• The civilisation is self-ruling negligible event, with, possible passing recovery abilities

If inner or upper instructions operate, the recovery/salvation is embedded occurrence; if men planning adds, we need suitably specialise our technical ‹knowledge›, maybe, with suited robotic empowerments as immanent or transcendent range. The field intensities and energy amounts timely engaged in natural paths make risible the local human acts; the entropic trends remain unaltered, leaving unknown if the imagined ‹big bang› has regeneration complements. Besides, matter and energy are arbitrary concepts, with cryptic readings, authorising the assembling with rationality or wisdom qualities. The growth sustainability goes parallel with the progress start. The latter appears outcome of the localism contingency; we might look at the former as yielded by the globalism breakthrough, via thrifty headway and ecology consciousness.

The globalism coherently brings to novel social arrangements, grounded on technical inventions:

• Global communication, exploiting worldwide web, with computer information aids
• Global economy, resorting to transnational markets and inclusive trade and finance
• Global ecology, asking pace wise control and rescue of the exhaustion and pollution

The ‹global village› starts, at first, welcoming the worldwide contacts and exchanges; soon, it displays the dire limits of sustainability, affecting the current transformation practices. The drawback visibility follows fit monitoring devices; it is result of the awareness that we conquest the improvements with source lessening and litter dumping. The computer and information processing aids give transparency to all side effects. The ‹industry steps›, from the third, include on line robots; the ‹industry 4 step› generalises the visibility to all engineering applications; the ‹industry 5 step› specifically comprises the ecology requests as routine tasks. The globalism breakthrough, already, technically defines by the recalled three global attainments, even if the ‹global village› critical sustainability investigations [109-139].

Localism Contingency

With the localism breakthrough, the human intelligence, via three-layer relational methods, leads to split-sovereign nation states. The trail avails of contingent ‹knowledge›, collective invention, propagated at the clan or parental compass, with agreed interpretation at tribe or nation range, due to:

• Personal discernment classifies the feelings and allots vocal/graphic symbols, with meaning
• Ensemble learning needs shared agreement on the selected symbols and allocated meaning

The cognition process appears widening the perceived actuality, assembling objects, linked qualities, states, locations, etc. and allotted readings. The all, indeed, uses symbolic transformations, to find out sounds and signs, to which assigning meaningfulness at the involved collective span:

• Abstraction Stage: The acquisition/discrimination resorts to usual data-mining processes
• Encrypting Stage: The encoding can use standard machine language, to binary formats

The symbol transition allows describing facts and sequences, stating judgments and inferring choices. The narrations develop in native languages, encoded cyphers, with clan’s agreed readings. The encrypting links to singled-out circumstances: the descriptions should be manifest, whatever used native languages, i.e., we shall dispose of meaningful language lexica and translations. There is no bounds inventing native languages. However, we just mention typical encrypting methods:

• Ideograms: Recourse to pictorial graphs, carrying evocative analogies and semantic syntheses
• Alphabetic Letters: Resort to sound coding of royals/consonants, with which building word sets
• Digital Cyphers: Use of binary sequences, with which implementing universal machine language

The visive, acoustic or machine bases specify how the communication establishes. The native languages, mainly, practice draft (East Asia) or audio (Europe) encrypting; the binary coding allows total unbiasedness. The formers show self-reliant self-sufficiency: the words coherence directly links to the agreed readings; the latter is standard machine way, sequencing the complexity, by series of picks. Today, the cognizance encoding, in the existing instrumentation, appears joining human and robotic procedures:

• Ensemble teaching, typically, started by parental training and fulfilled by schooling aids
• Diversified setting, mixing human and machine languages, with meaningful outcomes
• General construal, using translation dictionary and information permanent constancy

The ensemble teaching allows the human propagation of native language by parental tutoring. Whenever given symbols already have allotted reading, mixed-cognition allows to the robot descriptions with varied cyphers. Suited ‘symbol tables’ collect the defined quantities, with the backdrop rules to make automatic translations possible. The mechanism helps converting the human ‹knowledge› in science: native language texts are passing lectures; the agreed interpretations offer theories, suitably checked and approved, to be galactic information. The outcome allows planning improvements and avoiding snags: it is enough to grant contingent progress, however, dependent on the performed transformations.

The progress, established by the localism breakthrough, deserves self-ruling assessments, basically, if the detected ‹knowledge› assure aware transparency. The outcomes have bottom up ways, with regularities showing hierarchies and setups. Traditionally, the nation states have God’s grace kings; along ages, they have honourable conquerors and defeated folks; affluent elites and deprived crowds. Presently, democracy claims that, at birth, the people are free and equal: regular societies smooth and citizens/foreigners bias widens. The nation state rivalry transfers the Darwinism, from individuals, to closed groups: man autonomy becomes country sovereignty; the adaptive evolution allows getting effectiveness enhancing. The globalism breakthrough shows the end of, both, the individual and country autonomy; the ecology constraints entail compulsory reverse logistic and rescue tasks, not on local planning, but as global imperative,

Globalism Breakthrough

The globalism breakthrough obliges analysing the human anomaly within the general context of what happened around. Until now, the human intelligence is not incongruity, if justified by cosmic rationality or godly wisdom; from now, we shall give account on the dependence of the happenings contingency in view of total issues: civilisation and progress do not have autonomy, but they occur with side effects. The all is obvious with the entropy, which goes together with tangible transformations; it happens, also, in the social arrangements, by setups that turn questionable outcomes, without steady consistency.

The relational layers offer example hints, when we look at the governance setups of closed societies:

• The peoples benefit of unified management by godly authenticity with officialdom
• The countries enjoy hierarchical supervisions, after evolution generation of heads
• The citizens have intrinsic government talents, with legitimate kingship delegation

The split-sovereign nation states are truth, maybe, by holy Grace, evolutionism or native independence. The ecology shows that no autonomous item, act, fact or ensemble ca be bottom up inferred: all things and events link and affect each other. The holy Grace unified management and the hierarchical Darwinism offer total motivations; the democracy is contingent proposal, allotting transient worth to national governments, i.e., split-sovereignty, without upper or inner causes, is dubious, lacking founding for autonomy. The chance of total depictions allows faiths: godly miracles or natural soundness, granting safe overrunning the ecology checks. Otherwise, the way to the ‹global village› opens, obliging explicit management of recue measures, by the consciousness of the ecology restraints.

The globalism breakthrough, however, allows keeping the cosmic rationality or godly wisdom suggestions, on the human intelligence back. The hypotheses are complex result: we interact with the surrounds; the milieu is total enhancer, with further cues, when detailing the physical laws, using experimental data. The way to total ‹science› is permanent leeway, completing models and theories, giving coherent depictions of the reality. Thereafter, gene evolution and meme fruition happen adding earth anomalies, by intentional improvements, supposed following free decisions and independent planning. After localism, globalism tells that the actors are dependent and constrained, with biased picks and bounded controls. We, perhaps, may enjoy of total ‹science›, but we are contingent operators. Without faith in holy Grace or inborn Darwinism, we cannot the sovereignty and the men independence of judgment and planning.

The globalism breakthrough, then, is considerably different, if we can avail or not, of total backdrops. The ‹global village› looks at an open uniform society, subject to ecology restraints. The citizens are individually responsible of the depletion and contamination that they leave behind them: it is not possible inventing a sovereign layer, to which defer the autonomous governance of the supply chains; the competitive rivalry is no more challenge for effectiveness. The creation of families, clans, tribes, nations, etc., cannot authorise, distinguishing members from aliens; the regular closes societies, no more, build, since they cannot enjoy autonomy, rather, they finally, assemble the individual constraints. That kind of conclusion is, doubtless, obvious and the localism breakthrough interpretation was somehow misleading. Indeed:

• The regular societies independence requires that such total sort has upper or inner causes
• The global village uniformity simply replicates same ecology restraints for every individuals

The localism breakthrough regularity, maybe, is illusion, not less than cosmic rationality or godly wisdom. The invention of contingent ‹knowledge› and the profitable exploitation of human intelligence stay oddities with temporary effects, just, linked to the negligible earth. The faiths, leading to presence of the galactic information (and rationality) of existence of the holy reality (and wisdom), are result of fantasy or optimistic hopes. The construction of the ‹knowledge› and of ‹science›, actually, is peculiar attainment, making likely conceiving total frames, with rationality or wisdom consistency. In such condition, the ‹global village›, even, bypasses the ecology restraints and the society uniformity is resourceful start of global pace and friendly cooperation. 

The aware design and alert actuation bring the human civilisation out of the original backdrop, supplying helpful artefacts and purposeful setups. The vigilant cognizance establishes on meme fruition, as the active actuation founds on gene evolution; the results build expertise on schooling and efficiency on training. The knowhow shapes the perception, bringing to conceptualisation and encrypting, along cognizance, since the effectiveness leads to enhanced endeavours, along productive accomplishments. The intelligence, by meme fruition, seems to be the start of several options, notably, ‹knowledge› and mental worlds. The tentative readings, [140-167], open scenarios yet to acknowledge.

The human alertness exploits cognizance, to transform awareness in readiness. Proficient growth entails ‹knowledge› with actuation and design aptitude. The huge universe, possibly, has fit rationality or wisdom backstage, but the progress shall not begin, without planned cognizance and alertness, which are men or robots’ works. The presence of the backstage is open query; instead, we prove the cognition and alertness necessity; this is dilemma of the study, leaving undecided how our ‹knowledge› defines: the cognition is, maybe, only contingent imagery, shared as local clans’ designations, not universal qualities. Then, cognition is dependent ensemble inventions, with agreed consent; instead, alertness is natural watchfulness, with the individual preparedness to selective jobs in the material contexts. The two processes deserve suited notice.

Along such ideas, cognition is bottom up constriction, on meme fruition bases. The mind’s activities only mature on relative selections, for picking decides notions and encrypting agreed readings:

• The Abstract Intellection: Creation of concept, foo fact or aspects of the current reality
• The Encoding Bargain: Shared agreement on symbols and allotted meanings meaning

The cognizance develops invented concepts by teaching/learning procedures, given in charge to parents or reproducing existing natural signs, so that the ‹knowledge› is enlightening result, with intrapersonal abstract formats or intrinsic galactic entities/qualities: links and idioms start with inborn import: message passing follows ritual procedures. Men are the only animals building relational helps, having notions stated by shared language: instruction involves pupils; appraisal modifies sharing common ideas and rules, so that pupils increase their ‹knowledge›. The parental prospects and relational sceneries create native contexts or national setups: contingent appraisals connects to given surrounds, with local idioms. The nation states are obvious cultural outcomes, before, even, their political setting. The alertness, instead, is natural gift, getting out factual gene evolution results and enabling adaptive attainments. The implementation of technical contrivances. Thus, the creation of political settings need material updating and palpable alterations: the artefacts and setups modify the natural environs, adding manmade objects or changes, according to solid grounds. The substitute tackles and constructions are concrete facts in the universe, with physical sorts. The tangible changes have physical consistency.

The intellect modifies the natural trends, if men enjoy creativity and freedom in selecting improvements, while avoiding pitfalls. The innovations need intelligence and build on ‹knowledge›. The autonomy exists, if the localism prevails and disappears at globalism. Lacking self-sufficiency, planning and accomplishments include, as side snags, exhaustion of sources and contamination of the planer. The creative intelligence is residual help: mind metaphors (images and symbols) and relational practices (simulation and emulation) identify reasoning and judging results, so that the vigilance entails mindful assessment of emerging traps. The aware access to total ‹science› is fitting conscious alertness to look at remedial measures: the ecology sustainability resorts to adequate recycle and salvage jobs, exploiting galactic sources and offsetting earthy snags. The approach has factual back, but contingent worth: meme fruition grants intellection of ecology trends gene evolution shows adaptive planning chances. It is perhaps possible exploiting aware alertness, with reliable forward growth and balancing galactic reverse logistic aids.

The globalism breakthrough is puzzling prospect, with social uniformity and political unity of the earth inhabitants: all individuals or groups strictly have alike ecology restraints. The ‹global village› modifies the complexity of the earlier political setups, based on the local freedom and fancying spot-sovereignty. The conscious alertness is, perhaps, new myth, replacing autonomy of singles or nations, providing the higher effectiveness of creative intelligence. The globalism makes legend, free and equal citizens or sovereign and self-rule nations in competition; the lessening of earth’s resources and poisoning of the extant habitat need recovery and recapture measures, which have only chance, in the ‹global village› under managing robotic control, if creative intelligence exists. The managing robots and ‹global village› help, removing the ecology, from front end job, to global attainment by collective fulfilments. However, the contingent ‹knowledge› trail to creative intelligence credibility is object of the developed analyses: these supply noteworthy derails and give preliminary hints, if suite optimistic views are accessible.

1. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. Affidabilità e sicurezza del manufatto industriale: Attenzione allo sviluppo sostenibile. Tecniche Nuove, 2000.

2. Michelin, R.C. et al. “Diagnostics for monitoring maintenance and quality manufacturing.” Computer aided design and manufacturing: techniques and applications, edited by C.T. Leondes, vol. 2, CRC Press, 2001, pp. 2.10.01–2.10.62.

3. Michelini, R.C. et al. “Computer integrated assembly for cost effective developments.” Computer integrated manufacturing, edited by C.T. Leondes, vol. 5, CRC Press, 2001, pp. 2.7.01–2.7.66.

4. Michelini, R.C. et al. “Instrumental robot design with application to manufacture.” Computer integrated manufacturing, edited by C.T. Leondes, vol. 7, CRC Press, 2001, pp. 7.3.7.01–7.3.7.68.

5. Acaccia, G. et al. “Fabric feeding management for clothing manufacturing.” Digital enterprise: new challenges, edited by G.L. Kovàcs et al. Kluwer, 2002, pp. 416–427.

6. Cavallo, E. et al. “Deep-sea robot operation: digital mock-up and assessment.” Digital enterprise: new challenges, edited by G.L. Kovàcs et al., Kluwer, 2002, pp. 530–541.

7. Acaccia, G. et al. “Robotic mail forward and sorting stands performance and ergonomic assessments.” Digital enterprise: new challenges, edited by G.L. Kovàcs et al., Kluwer, 2002, pp. 542–554.

8. Michelini, R.C. et al. “La movimentazione delle parti.” Il manuale della macchina utensile, edited by M. Rossi and M. Mandelli, Tecniche Nuove, 2002, pp. 14.01–14.32.

9. Michelini, R.C. and G.L. Kovàcs. “Information infrastructures and sustainability.” Emerging solutions for future manufacturing systems, edited by B. Camarinha Matos, Springer, 2005, pp. 347–356.

10. Michelini, R.C. “Technical advance, information infrastructures and eco-labelling.” Newsletter 4 COVE IFIP WG 5.5, 2002, pp. 2–8.

11. Acaccia, G. et al. “Mobile robots in greenhouses inspection and treatment of plants.” CLAWAR News, no. 9, November 2002, pp. S.14–S.16.

12. Michelini, R.C. and G.L. Kovàcs. “Integrated design for sustainability: intelligence for eco-consistent products and services.” EBS Review, no. 15, 2002, pp. 81–95.

13. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Collaborative networked setups for eco-consistent supply chains.” Virtual enterprise integration: technology and organisation prospects, edited by G.D. Putnick et al., IGI, 2005, pp. 45–77.

14. Michelini, R.C. and G. Acaccia. “Distributed intelligence shops: quality clothes manufacture from fabric warehouse to sewn garments.” New developments in robotic research, edited by J.X. Lin, Nova Science, 2006, pp. 121–172.

15. Acaccia, G. et al. “Service engineering and extended artefact delivery.” Knowledge and technology management in virtual organisations, edited by G.D. Putnik et al., IGI, 2006, pp. 45–77.

16. Acaccia, G. et al. “Logistica inversa: dalla dismissione al riuso/riciclo.” Teoria, metodi e modelli per la logistica e la logistica inversa, edited by E. Mosca, Franco Angeli, 2008, pp. 219–285.

17. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Ubiquitous computing and communication for product monitoring.” Encyclopedia of information science and technology, edited by M. Khosrov-Pour, 2nd ed., IGI, 2008, pp. 3851–3858.

18. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Innovation for sustainability in product lifecycle design.” Computer-aided innovation, edited by G. Cascini, Springer, 2008, pp. 217–228.

19. Cavallo, E. et al. “SWAN: submarine wobble-free patroller with vectored thrust.” Robot vision: algorithms and motion planning, edited by D. Ito, Nova Science, 2009, pp. 211–277.

20. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Complexity patterns of closed industrialism.” Management and organisation of enterprise information systems, edited by M.M. Cruz-Cunha, IGI, 2009, pp. 329–351.

21. Michelin, R.C. and Ph. Coiffet. Essai sur les quatre capitaux assurant la fortune de l’humanité. Librairie de l’Académie des Technologies, 2010.

22. Frumento, S. et al. The duty-split approach in robot surgery. Nova Science, 2010.

23. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Environment-fusion: networked entrepreneurial opportunities.” Corporate environmental management information systems, edited by F. Teuteberg et al., IGI-BSR, 2010, pp. 347–364.

24. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Reverse logistic: the end-of-life vehicles pledge.” Discrete event simulation, edited by A. Goti, SCIYO, 2010, pp. 115–140.

25. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Firm safety: eco-management.” Communication in computer and information systems, edited by E.J. Quintela et al., Springer, 2010, pp. 111–122.

26. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Decision support for lifestyle manufacture business.” Enterprise information systems, edited by M.M. Cruz-Cunha et al., Springer, 2011, pp. 34–43.

27. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “The ecology industrialism bet.” Sociotechnical enterprise: information system design, edited by M.M. Cruz-Cunha et al., IGI, 2013, pp. 1–19.

28. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Industrialism reduction either complexity patterns.” Social, managerial and organizational dimensions of enterprise information systems, edited by M.M. Cruz-Cunha et al., IGI, 2016, pp. 329–351.

29. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Manufacture paths: robotics and sustainability.” Advanced manufacturing: progress, trends and challenges, edited by M.A. Mellal, Nova Science, 2021, pp. 126–188.

30. Belotti, V. et al. “Methodological portrayal of time-frequency and time-scale analysers.” XXVI IMEKO world conference on basic metrology, vol. 5, 2000, pp. 7–12.

31. Michelini, R.C. “Reality portrayal: space, time; displays analyses: particles-structures, quanta-fields.” XXVI IMEKO world conference on basic metrology, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 8–16.

32. Fukuda, T. et al. “How far away is ‘artificial man’?” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, 2001, pp. 66–73.

33. Cavallo, E. et al. “Tyre-soil effects on the manoeuvrability of a city-car.” International IEEE/ASME conference on mechatronics, July 2001, pp. 428–434.

34. Cavallo, E. et al. “Re-engineering example: dog muzzles mould automation.” 12th International conference on design tools and methods in industrial engineering, September 2001, pp. 132–139.

35. Belotti, V. et al. “Signature-driven paradigms for fault diagnoses.” 3rd International IEEE conference on diagnostics for electrical machineries, September 2001, pp. 312–320.

36. Belotti, V. et al. “Wavelet analysis for railway wheel-flat detection.” International conference on sound and vibration, July 2002, pp. 351–357.

37. Belotti, V. et al. “Railway wheel-flat recognition by wavelet transforms.” 5th International conference on misure meccaniche e termiche, September 2002.

38. Acaccia, G. et al. “Computer aids showing intelligent manufacture of quality dresses.” Computers in Industry, vol. 50, no. 1, 2003, pp. 71–85.

39. Acaccia, G. et al. “Robots in greenhouses farming: inspections and treatments planning.” International conference on service robotics, March 2003, pp. SR 07–SR 15.

40. Belotti, V. et al. “Wavelet signatures processing for the recognition of railway wheel-flat faults.” 18th IMEKO world conference on general metrology, vol. 7, June 2003, pp. 207–212.

41. Acaccia, G. et al. “Automatic fabric selection and feeding in quality clothing manufacture.” International journal of intelligent and robotic systems, vol. 17, no. 8, 2003, pp. 443–466.

42. Michelini, R.C. and G.L. Kovàcs. “Intelligent integrated design for sustainability: products-services.” 5th International conference on computer science and information technologies, vol. 1, September 2003, pp. 31–38.

43. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Product-service eco-design: knowledge-based infrastructures.” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 12, no. 4, 2004, pp. 415–428.

44. Cavallo, E. et al. “The decommissioning of submerged structures: prototype equipment.” International conference on offshore and polar engineering, vol. 1, May 2004, pp. 509–514.

45. Frumento, S. and R.C. Michelini. “Progetto di ausiliari co-robotici in tele-chirurgia.” Conferenza AIAS: innovazione nella progettazione industriale, August 2004, pp. 111–114.

46. Belotti, V. et al. “Remote control and monitoring of an underground robot drilling rig for landfill rescue.” International conference on automation and robotics in construction (ISARC), September 2005, pp. 58–68.

47. Bruzzone, L. et al. “Robot equipment for deep-sea maintenance jobs.” 5th International ASME conference on engineering systems design and analysis, July 2000, pp. 120–123.

48. Acaccia, G. et al. “A tethered climbing robot for firming-up rocky walls.” International conference on intelligent autonomous robots (IAR 2000), July 2000, pp. 307–312.

49. Ghigliazza, R.M. et al. “Restricted urban traffic guidance of district-despatcher by four powered wheels.” ATA conference on motor car engineering, vol. 54, no. 34, 2001, pp. 109–115.

50. Cepolina, F. et al. “Geko-collue: home-cleaning automation of floors, walls and cupboards.” 3rd International conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR), October 2000, pp. 803–812.

51. Cepolina, F. et al. “Char-robot: cooperative equipment for kitchen cleaning and sanitising.” Systems science journal, May 2001, pp. 109–116.

52. Cavallo, E. et al. “Task-driven gripper for robot picking and handing of limp sheets.” International CIRP conference on design in economy, June 2001, pp. 79–82.

53. Cepolina, F. et al. “Design of cooperating robotic rigs for the cleaning and sanitising of kitchens.” European workshop on service robots, June 2001, pp. 111–118.

54. Becchi, F. et al. “SARA: robotic car fuelling system.” International journal of intelligent and robotic systems, no. 32, 2001, pp. 37–54.

55. Cepolina, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Gecko: the autonomous walls cleaner.” International journal of industrial robots, vol. 29, no. 6, 2002, pp. 538–543.

56. Anthoine, P. et al. “Roboclimber project.” International conference on service robotics, March 2003, pp. RC1–25.

57. Cepolina, F. et al. “Robotic rigs for cleaning and sanitising walls and plants.” International conference on service robotics, March 2003, pp. SR16–23.

58. Bruzzone, L. et al. “Constraint singularities in force transmission in non-redundant parallel robots with less than six DOFs.” ASME Transactions Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 125, September 2003, pp. 557–563.

59. Cepolina, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Family of co-robotic surgical setups.” International journal of industrial robots, vol. 30, no. 6, 2003, pp. 564–574.

60. Cepolina, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Robots in medical fields: survey of in-body nursing aids and concept design hints.” 3rd International conference on industrial robotics ISR’04, March 2004, pp. 67(5).

61. Barberi, A. et al. “Underground robotic equipment for leachate draining and landfill remediation.” 3rd International conference on industrial robotics ISR’04, March 2004, pp. 101(5).

62. Cavallo, E. et al. “Remote-operated platform for underwater decommissioning tasks.” 3rd International conference on industrial robotics ISR’04, March 2004, p. 99(5).

63. Cavallo, E. and R.C. Michelini. “Robotic setups for AUV’s guidance by three DOF vectored steering.” 3rd International conference on industrial robotics ISR’04, March 2004, p. 88(5).

64. Cavallo, E. et al. “Conceptual design of an AUV equipped with three DOF vectored thruster.” International journal of intelligent and robotic systems, vol. 39, no. 4, 2004, pp. 365–391.

65. Cepolina, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Review about robotic equipment on minimal surgery invasiveness.” International journal of robotic and computer-assisted surgery, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 43–63.

66. Anthoine, P. et al. “Four-legged climbing robot for rocky wall consolidation.” World automation conference, July 2003, pp. 567–574.

67. Cepolina, F. et al. “Self-adaptable clamping tools for multiple seizure.” International conference on intelligent manipulation and grasping, July 2004, pp. 3082–311.

68. Michelini, R.C. and M. Zoppi. “Underactuated hands for manipulating balanced rods.” International conference on intelligent manipulation and grasping, July 2004, pp. 312–317.

69. Cavallo, E. et al. “Robotic system for offshore plants decommissioning.” International IFAC conference on control applications in marine systems SAMS’04, July 2004, pp. 131–137.

70. Cavallo, E. et al. “The unrigging of submerged structures: prototype design and operation assessment.” 7th International ASME conference on engineering systems & design analysis ESDA’04, July 2004, pp. 461–464.

71. Michelini, R.C. and M. Zoppi. “Sviluppo di robot per tele-operazioni in ambienti ostili.” Conf. AIAS: Innovazione nella Progettazione Industriale, August–September 2004, pp. 551–554.

72. Cavallo, E. et al. “Path guidance and attitude control of a vectored thruster AUV.” 7th International ASME Conference on Engineering Systems & Design Analysis ESDA’04, July 2004, pp. 465–468.

73. Cavallo, E. et al. “Control features of a vectored underwater vehicle.” 16th International IFAC World Conference, July 2005, pp. 310–319.

74. Cavallo, E. et al. “Design and control features of an autonomous underwater vehicle with thruster for space manoeuvers.” J. Machines, Manufacture & Reliability, vol. 6, 2005, pp. 98–107.

75. Cepolina, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Trends in robot surgery.” International journal of robot advances in urology, vol. 19, no. 10, 2005, pp. 940–951.

76. Cavallo, E. et al. “Особенности создания и управления автономным подводным аппаратом с одним движителем при его перемещении в пространстве.” J. Mechatronics: Automation & Control, no. 1, 2005, pp. 21–35.

77. Michelini, R.C. et al. “Trends in engineering design and eco-sustainable aims.” 12th International Conference on Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering, September 2001, pp. 125–131.

78. Michelini, R.C. et al. “Intelligent automation and simulation: activity at the industrial robot design laboratory.” International journal of modelling and simulation magazine, vol. 1, no. 2, 2002, pp. 60–76.

79. Michelini, R.C. and G.L. Kovàcs. “Product-service for environmental safeguard: a metric to sustainability.” International journal of resources, conservation and recycling, vol. 42, no. 1, 2004, pp. 83–98.

80. Cavallo, E. and R.C. Michelini. “Operation assessment of self-compensating vectored thruster AUV.” International Conference Offshore and Polar Engineering, May 2004, vol. 2, pp. 244–249.

81. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Product-service aimed at environment safeguard with ecology aims.” International journal of resources: conservation and recycling, vol. 42, no. 1, August 2004, pp. 83–98.

82. Belotti, V. et al. “Remote sensing and control via client-server layout by robotic landfill total recovery.” International IMEKO Conference TC1/TC7, September 2005, pp. 725–834.

83. Acaccia, G. and R.C. Michelini. “End-of-life vehicles gathering and disassembly: modelling and assessments.” International ESM-MESM Conference Eurosis’05, October 2005, pp. 34–43.

84. Acaccia, G. and R.C. Michelini. “Mixed automation of mail sorting facilities: design and running appraisal.” International ESM-MESM Conference Eurosis’05, October 2005, pp. 44–53.

85. Acaccia, G. et al. “Car dismantling facilities: programming and operation results.” International Conference ECEC & FUBUTEC, April 2006, pp. 75–85.

86. Acaccia, G. and R.C. Michelini. “End-of-life vehicle models with recycling prospects and handling plans.” International Conference ECEC & FUBUTEC, April 2006, pp. 82–87.

87. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Remote control underground robot for landfill drainage.” International Conference ASME ESDA, July 2006, pp. 1–8.

88. Acaccia, G. et al. “Automotive planning: end-of-life vehicle dismantling facilities.” International Conference ASME ESDA, July 2006, pp. 1–8.

89. Frumento, S. and R.C. Michelini. “Co-robotic rig carrying surgical end-effectors.” International Conference ASME ESDA, July 2006, pp. 1–8.

90. Kovàcs, G.L. and R.C. Michelini. “Ambient intelligence in product lifecycle design.” International Journal of Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 8, 2006, pp. 953–965.

91. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Wheel-flat diagnostic tool based on wavelet transform archives.” International Journal of Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, no. 6, 2006, pp. 705–718.

92. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Remote sensing and check by client-server architecture with application to robot landfill conclusive reclamation.” International Journal of Measurement, vol. 40, no. 3, 2007, pp. 109–122.

93. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Remote overseeing of car-brake pedal for reuse/recycle and life monitoring schemes.” International Conference REV‘07 Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, June 2007, pp. 111–117.

94. Acaccia, G. and R.C. Michelini. “Eco-management: end-of-life vehicle recycle.” Journal of Sustainable Engineering Management: Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, May 2007, vol. 43, no. 2/3, pp. 105–125.

95. Acaccia, G. and R.C. Michelini. “Reverse logistic and resource recovery.” Journal of Sustainable Engineering Management: Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, June 2007, vol. 43, no. 4/5, pp. 284–332.

96. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Humanitarian demining: efficiency by intelligent planning and low-cost robotics.” International EUROSIS Conference, June 2008, pp. 5–12.

97. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Lifecycle monitoring for eco-sustainability.” International Conference ASME ESDA ’08, July 2008, pp. 1–7.

98. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Remote robot control and mine cleaning strategies.” International Conference ASME ESDA ’08, July 2008, pp. 1–7.

99. Belotti, V. et al. “Lean robotics for safe mine sweeping.” International Conference Advanced Robotics, June 2009, pp. 351–354.

100. Belotti, V. et al. “Humanitarian demining: path planning by robot remote sweeping.” International Journal of Industrial Robot, vol. 36, 2009, pp. 146–157.

101. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Changeful knowledge and sustainable growth.” In Barait, J., Callaos, N. et al. Eds., Systems, Cybernetics & Informatics, Orlando, vol. 3, 2010, pp. 145–150.

102. Michelini, R.C. and G.L. Kovàcs. “Lifecycle eco-services for sustainability.” International Journal of Service Science & Management Research (SSMR), vol. 2, no. 4, 2013, pp. 48–56.

103. Crenna, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Robot driven cognitive revolution: sustainable growth images.” International Journal of Research on Computer Engineering and Electronics (IJRCEE), vol. 3, no. 3, June 2014, pp. 300–305.

104. Crenna, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Description and measurement of progress sustainability.” International Journal of Research on Precision Instrument & Machinery (RPIM), vol. 4, no. 6, 2014, pp. 5–11.

105. Crenna, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Robot driven cognitive revolution: sustainable growth images.” International Journal of Research on Computer Engineering and Electronics (IJRCEE), vol. 3, no. 3, June 2014, pp. 300–305.

106. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Anthropoid odds: robotics & cognitive revolution.” International Journal of Engineering Research & Management (IJERMS), vol. 1, no. 5, August 2014, pp. 177–185.

107. Crenna, F. and R.C. Michelini. “The sustainability bet: eco-project management.” International Conference on Project Management ProjMan 2014, Procedia Technology, Elsevier, vol. 16, 2014, pp. 934–942.

108. Crenna, F. and R.C. Michelini. “Decision support aid for eco-reliable product-service delivery.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems Centre, Procedia Technology, Elsevier, vol. 16, 2014, pp. 199–205.

109. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Take-back of end-of-use vehicles: parts/materials reuse and landfill running.” XVI International ADM Conference Tools and Methods in Engineering Design, June 2007, pp. 108–117.

110. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Eco-recovery: modelling and simulation features for extended artefacts.” International EUROSIS Conference, June 2007, pp. 35–43.

111. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Manufacture eco-consistency in the product lifecycle planning.” International IFIP Conference Computer-Aided Innovation, Milano, September 2008, pp. 1–5.

112. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “The service net facility integration appraisal.” International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, vol. 1, no. 4, 2009, pp. 371–392.

113. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Knowledge management for eco-design aims.” 9th International Conference Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS ’09), Milano, June 2009, pp. 151–156.

114. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Lifecycle design: value added appraisal.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems, Ofir, October 2009, pp. 597–611.

115. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Changeful knowledge and sustainable growth.” In Barait, J., Callaos, N. et al. Eds., Systems, Cybernetics & Informatics, Orlando, vol. 3, 2010, pp. 145–150.

116. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Decision support for lifecycle eco-design.” International Journal of Environment Conscious Design & Management, vol. 14, no. 3, 2010, pp. 67–85.

117. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Mankind growth: extant conditions.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems; Technologies & People, Viana do Castelo, October 2010, pp. 1–10.

118. Michelin, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Mankind growth: yet-to-be prospects.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems; Technologies & People, Viana do Castelo, October 2010, pp. 11–20.

119. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Lifecycle design-driven eco-protection.” International Journal of Environmental Conscious Design & Manufacturing, vol. 14, no. 3, 2011, pp. 66–85.

120. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Integrated design: lifecycle ecoconsistency.” WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, vol. 7, no. 9, 2011, pp. 275–284.

121. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Cognitive revolution: prosperity and sustainability.” International Journal of Productivity Management & Assessment Technologies (IJPMAT), vol. 1, no. 3, 2012, pp. 87–103.

122. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Entrepreneurial social and organisational inklings.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems, Villamoura, October 3–5, 2012, vol. 5, pp. 12–20.

123. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Formation and information of value-aided attainment.” International Journal of E-Business Development (IJED), vol. 2, no. 4, 2012, pp. 145–154.

124. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Global orders and intellectual deployment challenges.” In Callaos, N., Ed., International Conference Systems, Cybernetics & Informatics, Orlando, July 26–30, 2012, pp. 234–129.

125. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “The mankind growth consistency: outlook on political sceneries.” International Journal of Information Resources Management, vol. 25, no. 2, 2012, pp. 69–84.

126. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Relational deployments towards cognitive global frames.” International Journal of Systems, Cybernetics & Informatics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–5.

127. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Extended enterprise lifecycle reliability: the KILT model and TYPUS metrics.” International Journal of E-Business Development (IJED), vol. 3, no. 3, 2013, pp. 108–115.

128. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Robotics in cloth manufacture.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 17–22.

129. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Intelligent manufacture of quality apparels.” The Open Textile Journal, Bentham, June 2013, no. 6, pp. 1–17.

130. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Enterprise eco-watching and growth appraisal.” International Conference Enterprise Information Systems, Lisbon, October 23–25, 2013, vol. 9, pp. 646–654.

131. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Lifelong monitoring the eco-safe corporation.” International Conference Project Management, Lisbon, October 23–25, 2013, vol. 9, pp. 655–663.

132. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Entrepreneurial social and organisation inklings.” Information and Communication Technologies for the Advanced Enterprise: An International Journal, vol. 3, 2013, pp. 35–51.

133. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Social breakthrough to global collective order.” International Journal of Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. 11, no. 5, 2013, pp. 13–19.

134. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Robotic and cognitive revolution.” International Journal of Engineering Research & Management (IJERM), vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, pp. 21–29.

135. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Eco-design and management of supply chains: devised extended/virtual corporation innovation developments.” International Journal of Economics & Management Engineering (IJEME), vol. 4, no. 2, 2014, pp. 42–50.

136. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Understanding growth by KILT model & TYPUS metrics.” International Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS), Graz University of Technology, June 2014, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 924–940.

137. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Supply chain transparency: the eco-sustainable corporation.” Information and Communication Technologies for Advanced Enterprises: An International Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, 2014, pp. 23–29.

138. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Growth vs. spoil: knowledge sceneries.” International Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, 2014, pp. 1–14.

139. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Progress continuance sustainability.” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management (AJIBM), vol. 5, no. 12, 2015, pp. 829–838.

140. Michelini, R.C. Knowledge entrepreneurship and sustainable growth. Nova Sci., New York, 2008, pp. xviii–325.

141. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Cooperative minimal invasive robotic surgery.” International Journal of Industrial Robot, vol. 35, 2008, pp. 347–369.

142. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Gestire la fornitura prodotto-servizio.” Progettista Industriale, no. 1, 2009, pp. 72–75.

143. Michelini, R.C. Robot-age knowledge changeover. Nova Sci., New York, 2009, pp. xvi–344.

144. Michelini, R.C. and R.P. Razzoli. “Abilitare il fascicolo tecnico della costruzione.” Progettista Industriale, no. 3, 2009, pp. 81–84.

145. Michelini, R.C. Knowledge society engineering: a sustainable growth pledge. Nova Sci., New York, 2010, pp. xvi–350.

146. Michelini, R.C. Society progress evolution: sustainability and responsiveness. Nova Sci., New York, 2012, pp. xxxi–418.

147. Michelini, R.C. “Economy plans and growth features.” International Journal of Higher Education of Social Science (HESS), vol. 8, no. 3, 2015, pp. 37–48.

148. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “The intellect deployment: creation of civic modes.” International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology, vol. 16, 2015, pp. 57–69.

149. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “The intellect deployment: creation of civic modes.” International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology, vol. 16, 2016, pp. 57–69.

150. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. Cognitive revolution quest: human civilisation prospects. Aracne, Roma, 2016, pp. xi–775.

151. Belotti, V. and R.C. Michelini. “Relational modes and thrifty progress.” International Journal of Application Innovation in Engineering & Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, pp. 131–146.

152. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “The relational trails to sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility (IJSECSR), vol. 2, no. 1, 2017, pp. 7–14.

153. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Civilisation modes and ecology constraints.” International Journal of Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, 2018, pp. 803–812.

154. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Business sustainability and frugal chances.” International Journal of Robotic Engineering, May 2018, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1–11.

155. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Humankind engineering and management: robotic track.” Journal of Robotics and Automation, July 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–98.

156. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Progress bases: biology and cognition.” International Robotics & Automation Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, 2018, pp. 358–366.

157. Hein, A.K. Robotics and sustainable civilization: human-robot collaboration in industrial growth. Nova Science, New York, 2023, pp. 1–312.

158. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Anthropic advances: global robot driven rescue.” International Journal of Robotic Engineering, February 2020, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15.

159. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Progress queries and sustainability: basic views.” International Journal of Clinical Studies and Medical Case Reports, vol. 6, no. 4, 2020, pp. 130–136.

160. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Manufacture/relational modes: robots & sustainability.” International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering & Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, pp. 9–22.

161. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Progress management and ecology sustainability.” International Journal of Medical and Clinical Studies, April 22, 2021, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–15.

162. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Robot-like construal and civilisation.” Client Periodic Quarterly Medicine (CPQMe), vol. 12, no. 2, June 22, 2021, pp. 1–17.

163. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Robot-like construal and civilisation.” Client Periodic Quarterly Medicine (CPQMe), vol. 12, no. 2, June 22, 2021, pp. 1–17.

164. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Thrifty headway: robot cooperative aids.” Client Periodic Quarterly Medicine (CPQMe), vol. 12, no. 3, July 27, 2021, pp. 1–29.

165. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “The robot awareness sustainability.” International Journal of Education, Business & Economics Research (IJEBER), vol. 1, no. 1, November 2021, pp. 49–71.

166. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “Robots: aware headway and viable recovery.” Journal of Biosciences & Biomedical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1–12.

167. Michelini di San Martino, R.C. “The relational hypothesis of human societies.” Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, vol. 40, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–18.