<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjel</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJEL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJEL</journal-id><issn>2708-5120</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iajel.2022.v03i02.007</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chomsky's Universal Grammar</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>AbdulsattarSeger</given-names><surname>Hammood</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-a" /></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a">University of Baghdad, Iraq</aff-id><abstract>Language theory developments (grammar rules) share a number of concepts which show a fundamental change from conventional, intractable language descriptions: Concentrating on several discrete laws of grammar or on a variety of structural trends has led to further unitism. A robust overview of the explanatory vocabulary based on sound acquisition theory. Chomsky's universal grammar principle was the welcome. From a different angle he achieved in considering elements of vocabulary. He seems to be in an additional role. The objective of this essay is to prove such a point that this hypothesis not only depends on some of them. Each one has the feeling of understanding and integrating elements of the other if the vocabulary to be attained is fully accountable.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>