<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">srjehl</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">SRJEHL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SRJEHL</journal-id><issn>2788-9521</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/srjel.2026.v06i01.002</article-id><title-group><article-title>University Students' Understanding in Scientific and Humanities Disciplines of the Principles of Sustainable Development: A Comparative Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>AmerAbdulkareem Salim</given-names><surname>Alkkhi</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-a" /></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a">Department of Primary School Teachers, College of Basic Education, University of Misan, Iraq</aff-id><abstract>This study examined the level of understanding of sustainable development principles among students at the University of Wasit (Iraq), investigating&amp;nbsp;statistically significant differences between scientific and humanistic specialization students, as well as by gender. A descriptive-comparative methodology was&amp;nbsp;adopted. The sample comprised 200 male and female students distributed equally across four colleges: the Colleges of Science and Engineering (scientific track) and&amp;nbsp;the Colleges of Arts and Education (humanistic track), with 50 students per college. The Sustainable Development Understanding Scale developed by&amp;nbsp;Michalos et al. [1] and re-validated by Leal Filho et al. [2] was applied across four dimensions: general knowledge, environmental, economic, and social.&amp;nbsp;Results revealed a moderate overall understanding level (M = 3.09 out of 5), with science students significantly outperforming humanities students in the&amp;nbsp;environmental dimension (M = 3.71 vs. M = 2.86, t = 7.94, p &amp;lt; .001), while humanities students showed deeper understanding in the economic and social&amp;nbsp;dimensions. A behavioural gap was equally evident in both groups, suggesting that disciplinary knowledge alone does not bridge the knowledge–behaviour divide.&amp;nbsp;The study recommends integrating sustainable development courses as compulsory requirements across all University of Wasit specializations, alongside a cross-disciplinary institutional strategy.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>