<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iajl</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IAJL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IAJL</journal-id><issn>2709-9490</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iajl.2025.v06i02.006</article-id><title-group><article-title>Mistakes That Cause of Civil Liability for the Intelligent Applications Use (A Comparative Applied Legal Study)</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Abdullah Mukhlif</given-names><surname>Tarrad</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-a" /></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a">Department of Law, Al-Idrisi University College, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq</aff-id><abstract>The issue of determining the rules of civil liability for damages resulting from intelligent applications depends on the person responsible for these damages. Identifying the responsible person means identifying the person at fault who must pay compensation for damages resulting from intelligent applications. The difficulty lies in determining who is responsible for damages resulting from intelligent applications. This could be the manufacturer, distributor, programmer, owner, or custodian. The study's problem relates to the difficulty of determining the legal nature of intelligent applications, which have become characterized by privacy and decision-making autonomy, to the point that they have impacted theories of liability for damages caused by these applications, which utilize artificial intelligence. This has created difficulty in applying traditional liability theories, such as the defective product theory and the human agent theory. This calls for a search for solutions and the presentation of ideas that can contribute to building civil liability resulting from errors in intelligent applications.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>