<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iajl</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IAJL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IAJL</journal-id><issn>2709-9490</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iajl.2025.v06i02.001</article-id><title-group><article-title>Administrative Grievance</article-title></title-group><abstract>Administrative grievance is a means of resolving disputes in a friendly way that leads to reducing the emerging crises between those with stakeholders and administration, which reduces momentum on the judiciary in resolving these disputes. In addition, the control is a means of management as the case in controlling the work of its employees, and the administrative grievance in Iraq is particularly important due to the Iraqi legislator’s requirement for the affected by the administrative decision to conduct this path before feet to submit the appeal before the Administrative Court, based on rulings Article seventh/ second, and otherwise, the lawsuit is returned in form to not fulfill the formalism stipulated in the law.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>