<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iajl</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IAJL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IAJL</journal-id><issn>2709-9490</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iajl.2021.v02i01.003</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Four Forerunners for Law: Biasing, Alibiing and Backtracking Then a Narrative as Exemplified Solutions to Judiciary Processes and Others</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>IsmaelTabuñar</given-names><surname>Fortunado</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a" /><abstract>No one is above the law. There are suspects and victims. Sometimes one is a suspect and a victim. Sometimes there is a fair share of loss. What do we deal here? Is law impartial? Is it right to take law on our hands and on our side. There is no perfect crime. There is also no perfect court and people. Time and resources could be limited. Three good factors are considered: bias, alibi and backtrack. These words are defined in a relative or relational way. Narrative is also given importance.&amp;nbsp;</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>