<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjacc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJACC</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJACC</journal-id><issn>2709-1880</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjacc.2022.v03i02.013</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ease of I-Gel and Gastric Tube Insertion Among Three Different Techniques of I-Gel Insertion I.E. Standard, Rotational, Triple Airway Manoeuvre in Anaesthetized Paralyzed Adults -A Prospective Randomized Trial</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Neetiksha</given-names></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-a" /></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Urvashi</given-names><surname>Nautiyal</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-b" /></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Khan</given-names></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-c" /></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a">Medical Officer Specialist at Pt.JLNGMC Chamba</aff-id><aff-id id="aff-b">Medical Officer Specialist at SLBSGMC Ner Chowk Mandi</aff-id><aff-id id="aff-c">Medical Officer Specialist at ESI Parwanoo</aff-id><abstract>Background: The purpose of the current study was to examine the simplicity of inserting an I-Gel and stomach tube using three different insertion methods standard, rotational, and triple airway manoeuvre in anaesthetized paralysed adults. Materials &amp;amp; Methods: A total of 150 patients were included in this Prospective Randomised Trial at Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. R.P.G.M.C. Kangra at Tanda during the study period. The patients were divided into 3 groups with 50 patients each. The patients in group A included standard technique, group B with rotational technique, and group C included triple airway manoeuvre. Results: Our study showed that in standard group I-Gel insertion was easy in 84% of the patients, moderate in 14% and difficult in 2% of patients, in rotational group I-Gel insertion was easy in 94% of the patients and moderate in remaining 6% of patients, in triple airway manoeuvre group I-Gel insertion was easy in 92% of the patients and moderate in 8%of patients. Ease of I-Gel insertion was statistically not significant and were comparable between all the three groups (P = 0.384). In standard group gastric tube insertion was easy in 88% of the patients and moderate in 12%, in rotational group gastric tube insertion was easy in 96% of the patients and moderate in 4% and in triple airway manoeuvre group gastric tube insertion was easy in 100% of the patients. This might be due to better positioning and sealing in the triple airway manoeuvre technique with respect to both techniques (P = 0.025). Conclusion: Present study concluded that gastric tube insertion was significantly better in triple airway manoeuvre than standard and rotational techniques while Ease of I-Gel insertion was comparable between all the three groups.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>